The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (15 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $106.
Nasdaq, Inc. NDAQ
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Nasdaq, Inc.
read at $93.94
Nasdaq, Inc. holds its Markup at $93.94.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 1 days |
| Price | $93.94 |
| Valuation | 27.39 trailing · 20.18 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.00 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $89.91 fair value estimate, moderate competitive moat, 14.90% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 14.90% |
| Profit margin | 35.04% |
| Debt to equity | 77.69 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 15 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity screen. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Business activity: Financials sector Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Nasdaq exchange fails our ethical screen outright
Nasdaq runs the screens that light up trading floors from New York to London. Revenue climbs fourteen percent a year, margins sit at thirty five percent and the business still earns a sixteen percent return on equity.
We pass anyway. The shares sit four percent above our fair value and the whole operation fails the ethical screen on business activity grounds. Analyst targets at one hundred and eight dollars change nothing.
A moderate moat and steady cash flow look attractive until the screen says no. That rule exists for a reason and we follow it. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 20.2x priced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 27.4x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 14.9% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 35.0% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 16.5% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.78 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 1.01 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.00 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $52.5B |
| Employees | 9,613 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on NDAQ
- › Weekly Wrap: Crypto Struggles as Technology Stocks Fall CryptoProwl · 16d ago
- › Hyperliquid Falls 10% Amid Market Rout CryptoProwl · 16d ago
- › Nasdaq (NDAQ) Reports Next Week: Wall Street Expects Earnings Growth Zacks · 17d ago
- › NDAQ Stock Rises 1.6% in a Year: A Signal for Investors to Hold Tight? Zacks · 17d ago
- › SK Hynix ADR Premium Balloons to Nearly 50% Over Korean Shares Bloomberg · 19d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in NDAQ's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
NDAQ trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-18 | GRIGGS P C NELSON | Officer | 5,093 | $471,714 | |
| 2026-04-28 | PETERSON BRADLEY J. | Chief Technology Officer | 7,710 | $700,222 | |
| 2026-04-27 | TAL COHEN | Officer | 15,518 | $1,408,258 | |
| 2026-04-24 | DALY MICHELLE LYNN | Officer | 1,323 | $117,513 | |
| 2026-04-01 | FRIEDMAN ADENA T | Chief Executive Officer | 113,611 | $9,706,924 | |
| 2026-04-01 | TAL COHEN | Officer | 15,267 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | ZECCA JOHN | Officer | 7,339 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | SKULE JEREMY | Officer | 7,633 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | YOUNGWOOD SARAH | Chief Financial Officer | 15,267 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | SMITH BRYAN EVERARD | Officer | 7,046 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-22 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $88.48 | -1.8% | · | $982 | -1.8% |
| 2 months | $83.16 | +4.5% | · | $1,045 | +4.5% |
| 3 months | $83.79 | +3.7% | $0.27 | $1,041 | +4.1% |
| 6 months | $93.55 | -7.1% | $0.27 | $932 | -6.8% |
| 1 year | $85.04 | +2.2% | $1.08 | $1,035 | +3.5% |
| 2 years | $57.79 | +50.4% | $2.04 | $1,539 | +53.9% |
| 3 years | $55.45 | +56.8% | $2.92 | $1,620 | +62.0% |
| 5 years | $54.04 | +60.8% | $4.26 | $1,687 | +68.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.