The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $685.
MSCI Inc. MSCI
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · MSCI Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides research-based data, analytics, and indexes, supported by advanced technology worldwide.
read at $571.03
MSCI Inc. holds its Distribution at $571.03.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 24 days |
| Price | $571.03 |
| Valuation | 31.22 trailing · 25.42 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.24 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $518.50 fair value estimate, 12.20% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 12.20% |
| Profit margin | 40.74% |
| Analyst consensus | Strong Buy · 17 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity screen. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Business activity: Financials sector Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Benchmarks everyone uses yet we walk away
Every ETF and index fund that tracks global markets leans on MSCI data to set its rules. The business prints 41 percent profit margins and grows revenue at 14 percent a year, yet the shares trade at 27.4 times forward earnings while sitting 15 percent above our fair value. That combination alone keeps us out.
We pass for two clear reasons. First, the price leaves no margin of safety and the market already prices in strong growth. Second, the company fails our ethical screen on business activity grounds. This is exactly what the screen is designed to catch.
High margins can compress quickly if asset managers shift to cheaper data sources or if regulation tightens index licensing. The ethical flag removes any temptation to look past the valuation. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 25.4x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 31.2x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 12.2% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 40.7% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Current ratio | 0.89 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 1.24 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $41.5B |
| Employees | 6,319 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on MSCI
- › UBS (SWX:UBSG) Partners With MSCI To Open Up Private Markets Data Simply Wall St. · 13d ago
- › MSCI Set to Report Q2 Earnings: What's in Store for the Stock? Zacks · 13d ago
- › Exploring Analyst Estimates for MSCI (MSCI) Q2 Earnings, Beyond Revenue and EPS Zacks · 13d ago
- › Earnings Preview: SEI Investments (SEIC) Q2 Earnings Expected to Decline Zacks · 14d ago
- › MSCI (MSCI) Reports Next Week: Wall Street Expects Earnings Growth Zacks · 15d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in MSCI's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
MSCI trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | FERNANDEZ HENRY A | Chief Executive Officer | 4,000 | $2,249,591 | |
| 2026-05-01 | RATTRAY SANDY CAMPBELL | Director | 388 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | SEITZ MICHELLE | Director | 388 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | YANG JUNE | Director | 388 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | MATLOCK ROBIN | Director | 388 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | VOLENT PAULA J. | Director | 388 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | ASHE ROBERT GERARD | Director | 692 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | RIEFLER LINDA H | Director | 388 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | TANEJA RAJAT | Director | 565 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | SMITH MARCUS L. | Director | 388 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 27 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $582.53 | +4.4% | $2.05 | $1,048 | +4.8% |
| 2 months | $534.55 | +13.8% | $2.05 | $1,142 | +14.2% |
| 3 months | $534.42 | +13.8% | $2.05 | $1,142 | +14.2% |
| 6 months | $545.48 | +11.5% | $4.10 | $1,123 | +12.3% |
| 1 year | $550.16 | +10.6% | $7.70 | $1,120 | +12.0% |
| 2 years | $471.76 | +29.0% | $14.50 | $1,320 | +32.0% |
| 3 years | $456.63 | +33.2% | $20.46 | $1,377 | +37.7% |
| 5 years | $453.70 | +34.1% | $29.88 | $1,407 | +40.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.