The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $105. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Duolingo, Inc.
DUOL · Nasdaq · USD · Market cap $7.5B · 900 employees
Duolingo, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 4 Nov 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-11-04 · the tape above runs as of 23:21 UTC · 4 Nov · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price161.27 USD at the 4 Nov 2026 close
- Our value readFair vs our fair value, as of 4 Nov 2026
- Our regime readMarkdown, as of 3 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans slightly to calls (put/call 0.80)
- Last reviewed4 Nov 2026 (1 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $119.22 to $198.70, base estimate $148.23 (screen dated 2026-11-04).
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders insiders sold, $16,694,000, latest filing 2026-10-07
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 0.80, read 2026-11-02
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Duolingo, Inc. holds its Markdown at $161.27. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 37 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 37 days |
| Price at the screen | $161.27 |
| Valuation | 19.15 trailing · 21.11 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 1.02 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Accounts receivable
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 4.71% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is just 4.7% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling: it does not run on borrowed money. | Pass |
| Interest-bearing cash | 5.22% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 5.2% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 60.20% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 60.2% of assets, above the 49% limit. | Fail |
| Revenue purity | 4.36% | Below 5% | Only 4.4% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Duolingo,'s business is fine, but its receivables are about 60% of its assets, well over the ~49% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-11-04. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when DUOL's ethical verdict changes
Today DUOL does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Fair vs our fair value, as of 4 Nov 2026: it trades above our $148.23 fair value estimate, 18.30% revenue growth.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-11-04 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 8.8% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 18 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits −15% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $148.23, with a range of $119.22 to $198.70, dated to the 2026-11-04 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsGreen owl app meets modest upside and analyst doubt
Picture millions tapping through daily streaks on the Duolingo app, turning language practice into something closer to a game than a lesson. The company posts 26% revenue growth, 38% profit margins and 37% ROE, with an ethical screen cleared. Yet our fair value sits only 6% above the current price and 18 analysts carry a hold rating with a median target of $114, leaving little room for outperformance.
The valuation at 17.1 times forward earnings does not scream cheap once the growth rate normalises, and an unknown moat leaves the business exposed to bigger tech platforms that could copy the gamified format. High returns on equity are impressive on paper, but they rest on a user base that can switch apps or reduce spend without much friction.
Risk centres on execution in a crowded education space where free alternatives and school budgets can cap pricing power. Currency moves and ad revenue cycles add further volatility that the modest margin of safety does not fully offset. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 21.1xfairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 19.2xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 8.42 |
| EPS, forward | 7.64 |
| Revenue growth | +18.3%steady growth |
| Profit margin | 35.9%highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 34.4%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 3.98% |
| Debt to equity | 0.06minimal debt: a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 2.72comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.02moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.20% |
| 52-week range | 87.89 - 268.97 |
| Market cap | $7.5B |
| Employees | 900 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeDUOL trades on Nasdaq. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $105. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 3.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $105. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $105. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 4.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $105. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 2.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $105. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $105. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $105. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from accumulation to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $105. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 4.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $105. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Duolingo (DUOL) Faces Class Actions, Is The Stock Fairly Valued? Yahoo Finance · 5d ago
- Coursera Sinks 19% as Weak Q4 Guide and “Meaningfully Lower” 2027 Baseline Spark Downgrades Yahoo Finance · 5d ago
- Insights Into Duolingo (DUOL) Q3: Wall Street Projections for Key Metrics Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- Analysts Estimate Crane NXT (CXT) to Report a Decline in Earnings: What to Look Out for Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) Expected to Beat Earnings Estimates: Should You Buy? Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | Von Ahn Luis | Pres, CEO, Co-Founder, 10% | S - Sale+OE | 110,046 | $16,694,000 |
| 2026-09-24 | Von Ahn Luis | Pres, CEO, Co-Founder, 10% | S - Sale+OE | 46,682 | $7,031,794 |
| 2026-09-16 | Von Ahn Luis | Pres, CEO, Co-Founder, 10% | S - Sale+OE | 28,292 | $4,250,141 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $105.15 | +17.6% | · | $1,176 | +17.6% |
| 2 months | $90.03 | +37.4% | · | $1,374 | +37.4% |
| 3 months | $94.92 | +30.3% | · | $1,303 | +30.3% |
| 6 months | $200.96 | -38.5% | · | $616 | -38.5% |
| 1 year | $486.02 | -74.6% | · | $255 | -74.6% |
| 2 years | $197.86 | -37.5% | · | $625 | -37.5% |
| 3 years | $155.82 | -20.6% | · | $794 | -20.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever DUOL does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.