The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 1.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $88.
Stifel Financial Corp
SF · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $10.0B · 8,900 employees
Stifel Financial Corp.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 5 Nov 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-11-05 · the tape above runs as of 20:03 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price71.85 USD at the 5 Nov 2026 close
- Our value readUndervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Our regime readDistribution, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans to puts (put/call 1.39)
- Last reviewed5 Nov 2026 (1 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $79.24 to $132.06, base estimate $92.32 (screen dated 2026-11-05).
- Trend Distribution
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 1.39, read 2026-11-02
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its distribution label.
Stifel Financial Corp holds its Distribution at $71.85. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 144 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 144 days |
| Price at the screen | $71.85 |
| Valuation | 11.56 trailing · 9.47 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 1.01 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Excluded industry: Capital Markets
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Excluded industry: Capital Markets | Fail |
| Debt load | Excluded | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | Excluded | Below 33% | Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. | Fail |
| Receivables | Excluded | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. | Fail |
| Revenue purity | Excluded | Below 5% | of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Stifel Financial does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in conventional financial services, which the screen treats as interest-based, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-11-05. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when SF's ethical verdict changes
Today SF does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Undervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026: it trades at roughly a 21% discount to our $92.32 fair value, narrow competitive moat.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-11-05 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 22.2% discount to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 8 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +10% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $92.32, with a range of $79.24 to $132.06, dated to the 2026-11-05 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsWealth Manager Looks Cheap but Ethics Block Entry
Picture a broker handling client portfolios and deals across the US with steady 14% revenue growth and 16% profit margins. Stifel trades at 10.9 times forward earnings with a 15% ROE and a narrow moat, numbers that would normally draw attention. We pass anyway.
The ethical screen rules it out because capital markets sit on the excluded list. No valuation appeal or analyst target near 85 dollars changes that stance. The screen exists to keep us clear of these sectors regardless of the 24% gap to fair value.
Cyclical swings in deal flow and market sentiment still create real earnings risk even when multiples look low. Concentration in US wealth management adds another layer of exposure when rates or volumes shift. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.5xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| Trailing P/E | 11.6xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 5.77 |
| EPS, forward | 7.04 |
| Revenue growth | -0.2%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 16.6%healthy profit margins |
| Dividend yield | 178.00% |
| Debt to equity | 0.52moderate, manageable leverage |
| Beta | 1.01moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.00% |
| 52-week range | 65.40 - 89.83 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $10.0B |
| Employees | 8,900 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeSF trades on the NYSE. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $88.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $88. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $88. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $88. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $88. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $88. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 3.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $88. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $88. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $88. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Gerresheimer shares jump after Q3 revenue rises 8%, FY26 guidance held Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- What Just Happened To LPL Financial Stock? Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- Why Glaukos Stock Is Surging 30% and Headed for Record Close After Earnings Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- SkinHealth Systems (SKIN) Stock Fair Value Falls After Reverse Split And Hold Ratings Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
- Stifel: 3 Key Takeaways for Long-Term Investors Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-24 | Maria Elvira Salazar | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-22 | Diana Harshbarger | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-08-14 | Tony Wied | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-08-14 | Tony Wied | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-08-14 | Tony Wied | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $74.24 | -5.1% | $0.34 | $954 | -4.6% |
| 2 months | $76.87 | -8.4% | $0.34 | $921 | -7.9% |
| 3 months | $70.48 | 0.0% | $0.34 | $1,004 | +0.4% |
| 6 months | $86.93 | -19.0% | $0.68 | $818 | -18.2% |
| 1 year | $63.27 | +11.3% | $1.29 | $1,134 | +13.4% |
| 2 years | $50.58 | +39.3% | $2.47 | $1,442 | +44.2% |
| 3 years | $37.02 | +90.3% | $3.51 | $1,998 | +99.8% |
| 5 years | $39.78 | +77.1% | $4.99 | $1,896 | +89.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever SF does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.