Framework Journal · one stock, one dated entry

Recorded 2026-07-27 · Permanent

Nu Holdings Ltd. logoNu Holdings Ltd. NU

Outside both standards

An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.

The label
Markup

read at $14.53

Nu Holdings Ltd. holds its Markup at $14.53.

PHINPOOPSC
  • PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
  • INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
  • POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
  • OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
  • SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
  • edge confirmed
  • edge broken
  • edge forming

Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.

The investor read · the season, not the day

As held on the ledger · 2026-07-27
PhaseMarkup
Quantitative stateThe statistical read favours the buyers, held for 1 days
Price$14.53
Valuation22.35 trailing · 12.57 forward price to earnings
Values screenFAIL
Beta0.95

The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth

Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 22% discount to our $17.67 fair value, strong competitive moat, 43.70% revenue growth.

Read at
$14.53
22.35 P/E · 12.57 fwd
Our fair value
$17.67
22% discount
Analyst target (avg)
$18.00
+24% to current
Target low $10.00Analyst target rangeTarget high $22.00
▲ current $14.53 · | average target

Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going

$23.2$14.7$6.3TODAY3y agoPROJECTIONAnalyst high$22.00 +88%Analyst avg$18.00 +54%Our fair value$17.67 +51%Conservative$13.01 +11%

The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street

Current
$14.53
you are here
Conservative
$13.01
-10%
Analyst avg
$18.00
+24%
Our fair value
$17.67
+22%
Analyst high
$22.00
+51%

Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.

Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.

Revenue growth43.70%
Profit margin41.92%
Analyst consensusBuy · 22 covering

Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.

The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English

This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:

The common standard · AAOIFI
Used by most halal investing apps
✗ DOES NOT PASS
Our stricter standard · asset-based
The one Titan applies
✗ DOES NOT PASS

Why it fails. The problem is its business activity. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.

What these two standards are, and how they differ →

  • Business activity Financial sector: banks Fail
  • Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 0.0% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
  • Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
  • Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
  • Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass

Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.

The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean

Digital bank growth hits an ethical wall

Millions in Brazil and Mexico now manage money through a phone app rather than a branch queue. Nu Holdings shows revenue climbing 44 percent a year, a 42 percent profit margin and 30 percent ROE, all behind a strong moat and trading at 11.8 times forward earnings. We still pass because the business activity screen flags a clear ethical breach.

The numbers look attractive on paper and the margin of safety to our fair value sits near 30 percent. Consensus targets sit higher still. None of that moves the needle once the ethical test is failed.

Currency swings in Latin America and regulatory shifts remain real threats even before the ethical issue. The low multiple reflects those uncertainties rather than a bargain. Analysis, not advice.

The fundamentals · plain-English read
Forward P/E12.6x
cheap for a company growing this fast
Trailing P/E22.4x
a premium valuation
Revenue growth43.7%
growing very fast
Profit margin41.9%
highly profitable on every dollar of sales
Return on equity30.1%
an exceptional return on shareholder capital
Beta0.95
steadier than the market
Market cap$70.2B

The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.

Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.

Latest news · what the market is reading on NU

Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.

Related securities · others in NU's space worth a look

Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.

Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are

NU trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.

The trader read · the latest dated commentary

The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 26%. The street (21 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $19. Entered 2026-07-18 · Distribution

The dated journal · newest first, never edited

2026-07-18 Distribution $11.97 +0.0% Entry 3

The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 26%. The street (21 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $19.

2026-07-03 Distribution $11.97 +0.0% Entry 2

The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.

2026-07-02 Distribution $11.97 Entry 1

The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.

Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.

The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed

Most recent filings · NU
DateInsiderTitleTypeSharesValue
2026-05-15 SANDS ANITA M Director 21,000 $257,042
2026-04-08 FRAGELLI HENRIQUE CAMOSSA SALDANHA Officer 2,361,450 $770,390
2026-03-23 JUNQUERIA CRISTINA HELENA ZINGARETTI Officer 300,000 $4,444,162

Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.

The political ledger · congressional disclosures

Disclosures naming NU
DatePoliticianPartyTypeAmount
8 May2026 Rick Allen Republican buy 1K–15K
8 May2026 Ro Khanna Democrat buy 1K–15K
4 Jun2026 Cleo Fields Democrat buy 1K–15K
27 May2026 John Boozman Republican buy 1K–15K
2026-04-13 Ro Khanna Democrat Sale 1K–15K

What holding actually paid · price plus dividends

If $1,000 had been placed · historical, not a promise
PeriodPrice thenPrice returnDivs per share$1,000 becameTotal return
1 month $13.50 -13.4% · $866 -13.4%
2 months $14.96 -21.8% · $782 -21.8%
3 months $13.97 -16.3% · $837 -16.3%
6 months $16.82 -30.5% · $695 -30.5%
1 year $11.97 -2.3% · $977 -2.3%
2 years $11.82 -1.1% · $989 -1.1%
3 years $7.49 +56.1% · $1,561 +56.1%

Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever NU does next, these words stay.

Nu Holdings Ltd. · NU · Markup · $14.53
Recorded 2026-07-27 · before the outcome · scored mechanically

Get our weekly market brief free.