The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 1.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $150. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Apollo Global Management
APO · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $70.0B · 6,140 employees
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 29 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-10-29 · the tape above runs as of 22:21 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price118.56 USD at the 29 Oct 2026 close
- Our ratingAvoid, current read markdown
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans to puts (put/call 1.61)
- Last reviewed29 Oct 2026 (0 days ago)
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
What this means: price 118.56 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 154.34, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 1.61, read 2026-10-27
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Apollo Global Management holds its Markdown at $118.56. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 5 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 5 days |
| Price at the screen | $118.56 |
| Valuation | 42.49 trailing · 11.14 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.58 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Financials sector | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Apollo Global Management does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in conventional financial services, which the screen treats as interest-based, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-10-28. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when APO's ethical verdict changes
Today APO does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The quantitative screen above is arithmetic. Separately, community boycott lists cite this company: Listed by AFSC Investigate Database for: Portfolio includes Atlas Air, which transported weapons from the US to Israel. The desk records that flag here without folding it into the verdict: the screen measures the balance sheet, the overlay informs the conscience, and they are different judgements that belong to different owners. The second one is yours.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 30% discount to our $154.34 fair value, weak competitive moat, 63.80% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-10-29 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 30.2% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 20 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +26% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-10-29 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsApollo trips the ethical screen first
Apollo runs private equity and credit strategies that pension funds and endowments count on for steady returns. The stock sits at a forward multiple of 11.3 times earnings with a 28 percent gap to our fair value, yet we pass for reasons that start with the ethical screen and do not end there.
Revenue fell 9 percent, profit margins sit at just 4 percent and return on equity is only 8 percent. The moat is rated weak, which fits a business whose results move with deal flow and credit cycles rather than durable advantages. The ethical fail on business activity closes the case regardless of analyst targets clustered around 148.
Low multiples on cyclical asset managers often signal peak earnings rather than bargains, and the ethical breach removes any reason to look closer. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 11.1xcheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 42.5xexpensive: the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| EPS, trailing | 2.79 |
| EPS, forward | 10.65 |
| Revenue growth | +63.8%growing very fast |
| Profit margin | 5.3%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 11.4%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Dividend yield | 169.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.01a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.95healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 1.58much more volatile than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.04% |
| 52-week range | 99.56 - 153.29 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $70.0B |
| Employees | 6,140 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeAPO trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $150. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $150. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $150.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 5.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $150.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 2.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $150.
The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 6.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $150.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 6.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $150.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $150. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $150. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- ADT Stock Hits Near 4-Year Highs – Joshua Kushner-Backed Thrive Holdings To Acquire ADT At $10 Per Share Yahoo Finance · 7h ago
- ADT Soars 34% on a $10 Buyout: What It Means for the ETFs That Own It Yahoo Finance · 7h ago
- ADT stock spikes 34% on $7.6 billion takeover deal by Josh Kushner’s Thrive Yahoo Finance · 8h ago
- ADT Soars 34% on $15.3 Billion Thrive Buyout Backed by “Patience to Invest Over Decades” Yahoo Finance · 8h ago
- Wall Street's Insights Into Key Metrics Ahead of Apollo Global Management (APO) Q3 Earnings Yahoo Finance · 11h ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | KELLY MARTIN B | Chief Financial Officer | 570 | · | |
| 2026-05-14 | KELLY MARTIN B | Chief Financial Officer | 7,000 | $942,514 | |
| 2026-05-07 | O'NEILL MITRA | Director | 1,771 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | KLEINMAN SCOTT M | President | 2,048 | $264,663 | |
| 2026-02-13 | BELARDI JAMES RICHARD | Officer and Director | 147,813 | $4,367,874 | |
| 2026-02-10 | CHATTERJEE WHITNEY A | Officer | 96,046 | · | |
| 2026-02-10 | ZITO JOHN P. | Officer | 167,252 | · | |
| 2026-02-10 | KINAHAN KRISTIANE ELAINE | Officer | 10,912 | · | |
| 2026-02-10 | KELLY MARTIN B | Chief Financial Officer | 116,087 | · | |
| 2026-02-10 | BELARDI JAMES RICHARD | Officer and Director | 41,892 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-28 | Sheri Biggs | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-28 | Sheri Biggs | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-28 | Sheri Biggs | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-10 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-10 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $129.91 | +1.8% | $0.56 | $1,022 | +2.2% |
| 2 months | $103.84 | +27.3% | $0.56 | $1,279 | +27.9% |
| 3 months | $99.88 | +32.4% | $0.56 | $1,330 | +33.0% |
| 6 months | $149.09 | -11.3% | $1.07 | $894 | -10.6% |
| 1 year | $133.49 | -0.9% | $2.09 | $1,006 | +0.6% |
| 2 years | $115.34 | +14.7% | $3.99 | $1,181 | +18.1% |
| 3 years | $69.60 | +90.0% | $5.75 | $1,982 | +98.2% |
| 5 years | $52.23 | +153.2% | $9.18 | $2,708 | +170.8% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever APO does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.