The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 21%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $145.
Ares Management ARES
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Ares Management Corporation operates as an alternative asset manager.
read at $127.76
Ares Management holds its Markup at $127.76.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 10 days |
| Price | $127.76 |
| Valuation | 58.61 trailing · 17.69 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.54 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $124.16 fair value estimate, 28.30% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as roughly fairly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 28.30% |
| Profit margin | 10.54% |
| Debt to equity | 168.76 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 18 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity screen. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Business activity: Financials sector Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Ethical Screen Failure Means We Avoid Ares
Picture a mid sized company tapping private credit when the banks say no. Ares sits in that lane as an alternative asset manager. We pass because the business activity screen flags it outright, even though revenue is rising 28 percent a year and the forward multiple sits at 17.2 times.
Valuation offers almost no margin of safety at the current price against our fair value. Return on equity of 14 percent and profit margins of 11 percent are respectable yet fail to offset the ethical red line. Analyst targets may sit higher, but the screen verdict stands.
Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 17.7x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 58.6x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 28.3% strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | 10.5% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 14.2% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.69 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.49 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 1.54 much more volatile than the market |
| Market cap | $42.1B |
| Employees | 4,297 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on ARES
- › New York Yankees in Talks With Apollo Over $3 Billion Financing Deal Bloomberg · 17d ago
- › Youth lacrosse costs families up to $25,000. This former pro player wants to change that. Yahoo Finance · 25d ago
- › BlackRock Sees Private Credit Taking Bigger Role in AI Buildout Bloomberg · 25d ago
- › Software Markdowns at Mutual Funds Hint at Private Markets’ Pain Bloomberg · 26d ago
- › Ares Management (ARES) Stock Looks Reasonable On Fair Value But Rich On Earnings Simply Wall St. · 29d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in ARES's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
ARES trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 21%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $145.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 21%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $145.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-20 | OLIAN JUDY D. | Director | 480 | $59,726 | |
| 2026-02-06 | BHUTANI ASHISH | Director | 10,000 | $1,266,100 | |
| 2026-02-04 | SAGATI AGHILI NASEEM | General Counsel | 3,921 | $529,032 | |
| 2026-01-30 | AROUGHETI MICHAEL J | Chief Executive Officer | 200,000 | · | |
| 2026-01-30 | DEVEER ROBERT KIPP III | President | 200,000 | · | |
| 2026-01-30 | SAGATI AGHILI NASEEM | General Counsel | 100,000 | · | |
| 2026-01-30 | PHILLIPS JARROD | Chief Financial Officer | 100,000 | · | |
| 2026-01-30 | JACOBSON BLAIR VICTOR | President | 300,000 | · | |
| 2026-01-22 | SAGATI AGHILI NASEEM | General Counsel | 1,849 | $299,239 | |
| 2026-01-20 | SAGATI AGHILI NASEEM | General Counsel | 2,712 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 27 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 27 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 27 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 27 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $124.61 | +3.7% | · | $1,037 | +3.7% |
| 2 months | $100.46 | +28.6% | · | $1,286 | +28.6% |
| 3 months | $95.20 | +35.7% | $1.35 | $1,371 | +37.1% |
| 6 months | $173.37 | -25.5% | $2.47 | $759 | -24.1% |
| 1 year | $163.11 | -20.8% | $4.71 | $821 | -17.9% |
| 2 years | $128.98 | +0.1% | $8.62 | $1,068 | +6.8% |
| 3 years | $84.42 | +53.0% | $11.86 | $1,670 | +67.0% |
| 5 years | $50.82 | +154.2% | $16.48 | $2,866 | +186.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.