The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 15.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 31%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $19.
NatWest Group Plc ADR NWG
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · NatWest Group plc, together with its subsidiaries, provides banking and financial products and services in the United Kingdom and internationally.
read at $19.22
NatWest Group Plc ADR holds its Markup at $19.22.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 2 days |
| Price | $19.22 |
| Valuation | 9.56 trailing · 9.18 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 0.82 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 14.50% |
| Profit margin | 37.73% |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 4 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its excluded industry: banks - regional. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Excluded industry: Banks - Regional Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
UK Bank That Hits Our Ethical Wall
Picture the queues at a high street branch or the salary landing in an account each month. NatWest sits at the centre of that everyday flow for millions of British customers and businesses. We pass on the name outright because it fails our ethical screen on banks.
The business shows an 8.6 times forward earnings multiple, 8 percent revenue growth and a 37 percent profit margin with 14 percent ROE. Those figures look steady enough on paper yet none of them move the ethical verdict. The screen exists precisely to keep excluded sectors off the table regardless of valuation.
Risk here is straightforward and non negotiable. We do not override the industry exclusion even when the price sits below our own fair value estimate. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.2x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 9.6x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Revenue growth | 14.5% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 37.7% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 14.8% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Beta | 0.82 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $76.5B |
| Employees | 53,200 |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to United Kingdom and to currency swings.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on NWG
- › Andy Burnham set to become UK PM as policy agenda remains unclear Investing.com · 11 Jul 2026
- › 5 Solid Dividend Stocks to Buy in July 24/7 Wall St. · 10 Jul 2026
- › UBS to Pilot U.S. Banking Services Ahead of Wealth Client Rollout Zacks · 6 Jul 2026
- › NatWest Group (NWG) Launches AI and Data Ethics Accreditation for All Employees Insider Monkey · 27 Jun 2026
- › Burnham emerges as frontrunner to replace Starmer as Labour leadership race nears Investing.com · 27 Jun 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in NWG's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 31%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $19.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $15.76 | -1.3% | · | $987 | -1.3% |
| 2 months | $16.55 | -6.0% | · | $940 | -6.0% |
| 3 months | $14.69 | +5.9% | $0.62 | $1,101 | +10.1% |
| 6 months | $16.06 | -3.2% | $0.62 | $1,007 | +0.7% |
| 1 year | $13.15 | +18.3% | $0.88 | $1,249 | +24.9% |
| 2 years | $7.22 | +115.4% | $1.42 | $2,350 | +135.0% |
| 3 years | $5.36 | +190.2% | $1.99 | $3,273 | +227.3% |
| 5 years | $4.32 | +259.8% | $3.05 | $4,303 | +330.3% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.