The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 21.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 12% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (4 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $16. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter.
Mission Produce, Inc. AVO
Clears both ethical standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Mission Produce, Inc.
read at $13.59
Mission Produce, Inc. holds its Markup at $13.59.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · insiders bought, latest filing 2026-06-30
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 109 days |
| Price | $13.59 |
| Valuation | 42.47 trailing · 16.28 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.49 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | -23.50% |
| Profit margin | 1.83% |
| Debt to equity | 35.60 |
| Analyst consensus | Strong Buy · 4 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company clears both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Avocados look cheap but growth has vanished
Picture a fruit trader whose sales just dropped a quarter while margins sit at two percent. Mission Produce moves avocados and mangoes to supermarkets and restaurants, yet revenue is down 24 percent and return on equity is only 4 percent. The shares trade at 16.3 times forward earnings with a 22 percent gap to our fair value, but those numbers sit on a business that is shrinking rather than compounding.
We pass because the low return and negative growth point to a company stuck in a tough patch with no clear path out. A 16 times multiple is not a bargain when earnings are already thin and volume trends are negative. The ethical screen clears, yet the operating record does not meet the bar we set for owning a position.
Four analysts still call it a strong buy with a 16 dollar target. We see a classic value trap where the multiple looks reasonable only because profits have already fallen. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 16.3x reasonably valued |
| Trailing P/E | 42.5x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | -23.5% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 1.8% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 4.0% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.36 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 1.91 healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 0.49 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $1.2B |
| Employees | 3,800 |
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in AVO's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
AVO trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 12% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (4 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $16.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | Pack Jay A | Dir | Purchase | 40,000 | $2 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $12.72 | -11.7% | · | $883 | -11.7% |
| 2 months | $14.81 | -24.2% | · | $758 | -24.2% |
| 3 months | $13.23 | -15.1% | · | $849 | -15.1% |
| 6 months | $12.59 | -10.8% | · | $892 | -10.8% |
| 1 year | $11.50 | -2.4% | · | $977 | -2.4% |
| 2 years | $10.53 | +6.7% | · | $1,067 | +6.7% |
| 3 years | $13.40 | -16.2% | · | $838 | -16.2% |
| 5 years | $22.69 | -50.5% | · | $495 | -50.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.