The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 7.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 35%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $86.
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. CHEF
Clears the common standard
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, distributes specialty food and center-of-the-plate products in the United States, the Middle East, and Canada.
read at $110.20
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. holds its Markup at $110.20.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 16 days |
| Price | $110.20 |
| Valuation | 52.48 trailing · 36.79 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 1.39 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 12.90% |
| Profit margin | 2.09% |
| Debt to equity | 146.03 |
| Analyst consensus | Strong Buy · 9 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 48.1% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Against market value it is 24.7%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 25.3% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Premium food distributor priced past its value
Walk into any serious restaurant kitchen and the specialty cheeses, oils and charcuterie arrive through a focused US distributor that has built real relationships with chefs. Revenue is still rising at 11 percent, return on equity sits at 14 percent and the ethical screen is clean. Yet the shares trade at 36 times forward earnings with a profit margin of just 2 percent, well above our fair value of 76.88 dollars against a current price of 97.08 dollars.
That leaves no margin of safety and an opportunity rating of none. The business serves a defensive niche, yet paying a multiple that assumes sustained high growth while margins remain thin leaves little room for the normal bumps that hit food distribution.
Analyst targets sit higher still, but price paid matters more than consensus. The combination of elevated valuation and thin profitability creates the classic risk that growth slows or costs rise and the multiple compresses quickly. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 36.8x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 52.5x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 12.9% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 2.1% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 15.3% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.46 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 2.15 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.39 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $4.5B |
| Employees | 5,156 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in CHEF's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
CHEF trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 35%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $86.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $80.69 | +5.0% | · | $1,050 | +5.0% |
| 2 months | $64.53 | +31.4% | · | $1,314 | +31.4% |
| 3 months | $63.97 | +32.5% | · | $1,325 | +32.5% |
| 6 months | $62.57 | +35.5% | · | $1,355 | +35.5% |
| 1 year | $62.66 | +35.3% | · | $1,353 | +35.3% |
| 2 years | $38.76 | +118.7% | · | $2,187 | +118.7% |
| 3 years | $32.11 | +164.0% | · | $2,640 | +164.0% |
| 5 years | $32.72 | +159.1% | · | $2,591 | +159.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.