The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 24%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (15 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $113.
Hasbro HAS
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Hasbro, Inc.
read at $96.34
Hasbro holds its Distribution at $96.34.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 25 days |
| Price | $96.34 |
| Valuation | 16.14 trailing · 14.77 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.48 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 23% discount to our $118.06 fair value, weak competitive moat, 16.20% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 16.20% |
| Profit margin | 15.97% |
| Debt to equity | 484.49 |
| Analyst consensus | Strong Buy · 13 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 59.4% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 1.9% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 33.1% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.6% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Toy Giant's Debt Breaks Every Ethical Rule
Every time a child rips open a new board game or trading card pack, Hasbro should be printing cash. Instead the company is posting a negative five percent profit margin and a negative twenty three percent return on equity while its debt ratio has already tripped our ethical screen.
We pass for clear reasons. The business carries weak competitive protection, revenue growth of thirteen percent has not translated into profits, and the forward multiple of twelve point eight times sits on top of losses rather than earnings power. Analyst enthusiasm and a hundred and ten dollar median target do not override the balance sheet reality.
The real risk is a classic cyclical trap where peak toy demand meets stretched leverage. Any slowdown in consumer spending would quickly expose how little room exists for error. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 14.8x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 16.1x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 16.2% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 16.0% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 159.6% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 4.84 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.66 healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 0.48 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $13.6B |
| Employees | 4,520 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in HAS's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
HAS trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-16 | SIBLEY TARRANT LIVINGSTON III | Officer | 8,422 | · | |
| 2026-03-16 | GOETTER GINA M | Chief Financial Officer | 21,389 | · | |
| 2026-03-16 | COCKS CHRISTIAN P | Chief Executive Officer | 56,144 | · | |
| 2026-03-16 | BARBACOVI HOLLY | Officer | 6,918 | · | |
| 2026-03-16 | HIGHT JOHN | Officer | 10,695 | · | |
| 2026-03-16 | BUNGE JASON M | Officer | 4,540 | · | |
| 2026-02-26 | COCKS CHRISTIAN P | Chief Executive Officer | 196,411 | $10,955,806 | |
| 2026-02-26 | COCKS CHRISTIAN P | Chief Executive Officer | 196,411 | $19,706,037 | |
| 2026-02-20 | SIBLEY TARRANT LIVINGSTON III | Officer | 20,489 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | COCKS CHRISTIAN P | Chief Executive Officer | 97,786 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Bill Keating | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2025-06-17 | John Fetterman | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2024-03-15 | Tony Wied | buy | 15000 | |
| 2023-04-10 | Andy Barr | buy | 20000 | |
| 2 Jun2026 | John Curtis | Republican | buy | 100K–250K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $94.42 | -12.7% | $0.70 | $881 | -11.9% |
| 2 months | $90.98 | -9.4% | $0.70 | $914 | -8.6% |
| 3 months | $94.34 | -12.6% | $0.70 | $882 | -11.8% |
| 6 months | $82.71 | -0.3% | $1.40 | $1,014 | +1.4% |
| 1 year | $66.61 | +23.8% | $2.80 | $1,280 | +28.0% |
| 2 years | $54.19 | +52.2% | $5.60 | $1,625 | +62.5% |
| 3 years | $53.05 | +55.5% | $8.40 | $1,713 | +71.3% |
| 5 years | $79.75 | +3.4% | $13.94 | $1,209 | +20.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.