The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 2.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $37. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Figma Inc
FIG · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $13.1B · 1,886 employees
Figma, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 5 Nov 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-11-05 · the tape above runs as of 20:03 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price18.44 USD at the 5 Nov 2026 close
- Our value readOvervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Our regime readMarkdown, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans to puts (put/call 1.26)
- Last reviewed5 Nov 2026 (1 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $19.48 to $22.40, base estimate $19.48 (screen dated 2026-11-05).
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders insiders sold, $458,594, latest filing 2026-10-15
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 1.26, read 2026-11-02
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Figma Inc holds its Markdown at $18.44. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 35 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 35 days |
| Price at the screen | $18.44 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 71.48 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Interest-bearing securities
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 2.49% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is just 2.5% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling: it does not run on borrowed money. | Pass |
| Interest-bearing cash | 54.00% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing cash and securities are 54.0% of assets, above the one-third limit. | Fail |
| Receivables | 27.74% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 27.7% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 5.89% | Below 5% | 5.9% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Figma's business is fine, but its cash and interest-bearing securities are about 54% of its assets, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-11-05. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when FIG's ethical verdict changes
Today FIG does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Overvalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026: it trades above our $19.48 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat, 48.20% revenue growth.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-11-05 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 5.3% discount to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 10 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +63% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $19.48, with a range of $19.48 to $22.40, dated to the 2026-11-05 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsFigma's fast growth meets a steep price tag
Picture a team of designers in three time zones tweaking the same screen in real time. That is Figma's browser-based platform, and it is pulling in revenue at 46 percent a year. Yet the shares trade at 73 times forward earnings while the company posts a 124 percent negative profit margin and negative 102 percent return on equity.
We pass. The price sits 20 percent above our fair value and the narrow moat does not justify paying up for losses that keep widening. Analyst targets at 30 dollars ignore the simple fact that rapid top-line growth has not yet produced cash or profits.
Risk sits in the valuation itself. Any slowdown in design spending would leave the multiple looking even more exposed, and the current losses offer little cushion. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 71.5xpriced for continued growth |
| EPS, trailing | -3.23 |
| EPS, forward | 0.34 |
| Revenue growth | +48.2%growing very fast |
| Profit margin | -123.1%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -108.6%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | 6.60% |
| Debt to equity | 4.58heavy leverage: higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 2.45comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Short interest, float | 0.20% |
| 52-week range | 16.60 - 55.48 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $13.1B |
| Employees | 1,886 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeFIG trades on the NYSE. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $37. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $37. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 12.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $37. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $37. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $37. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $37. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $37. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from markdown to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 13.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $37. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter.
The framework has shifted from accumulation to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $37. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Arista Networks vs. Figma: Which Technology Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026? Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- Figma vs. Fastly: Which Cloud Tech Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026? Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- Palantir Technologies vs. Figma: Comparing Revenue Growth Trends Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- Figma vs. Monday.com: Which Tech Stock Is the Better Buy in 2026? Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
- Oppenheimer names top SMID software stocks ahead of Q3 earnings Yahoo Finance · 15d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-15 | Radakovich Lynn Vojvodich | Dir | S - Sale+OE | 20,266 | $458,594 |
| 2026-10-05 | Herb Tyler | Chief Accounting Officer | S - Sale | 1,418 | $30,664 |
| 2026-10-05 | Mulligan Brendan | GC, Secretary | S - Sale | 20,701 | $449,990 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $20.05 | -1.1% | · | $989 | -1.1% |
| 2 months | $18.16 | +9.2% | · | $1,092 | +9.2% |
| 3 months | $26.17 | -24.2% | · | $758 | -24.2% |
| 6 months | $38.69 | -48.7% | · | $513 | -48.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever FIG does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.