The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 1.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 23% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (9 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $36.
ManpowerGroup Inc.
MAN · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $2.2B · 25,400 employees
ManpowerGroup Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 5 Nov 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-11-05 · the tape above runs as of 00:43 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price46.27 USD at the 5 Nov 2026 close
- Our value readUndervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Our regime readDistribution, as of 7 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans heavily to calls (put/call 0.31)
- Last reviewed5 Nov 2026 (2 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $62.50 to $92.54, base estimate $62.50 (screen dated 2026-11-05).
- Trend Distribution
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 0.31, read 2026-11-02
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its distribution label.
ManpowerGroup Inc. holds its Distribution at $46.27. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 11 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 11 days |
| Price at the screen | $46.27 |
| Valuation | 18.29 trailing · 9.97 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.76 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Accounts receivable
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 22.80% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is just 22.8% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling: it does not run on borrowed money. | Pass |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 61.59% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 61.6% of assets, above the 49% limit. | Fail |
| Revenue purity | 0.15% | Below 5% | Only 0.2% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
ManpowerGroup's business is fine, but its receivables are about 62% of its assets, well over the ~49% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-11-05. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when MAN's ethical verdict changes
Today MAN does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Undervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026: it trades at roughly a 26% discount to our $62.50 fair value, 4.40% revenue growth.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-11-05 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 26.0% discount to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 9 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +8% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $62.50, with a range of $62.50 to $92.54, dated to the 2026-11-05 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsStaffing firms ride every boom and bust
When the economy wobbles, companies cut temporary hires first and ManpowerGroup feels it straight away. The stock trades at 10.8 times forward earnings with 8 percent revenue growth, yet it delivers only 1 percent profit margins and 5 percent return on equity. That combination signals a cyclical business whose low multiple reflects peak-cycle earnings rather than a bargain, which is why we pass despite the ethical screen clearing.
The 31 percent gap to our fair value estimate looks attractive on paper, but thin returns and unknown competitive edge leave little room for error when client demand turns. Nine analysts lean buy with a 55 dollar median target, yet history shows staffing multiples compress fast once hiring freezes hit.
Currency swings, client concentration and sudden order drops remain the real threats, none of which the current multiple appears to price in fully. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 10.0xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 18.3xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 2.53 |
| EPS, forward | 4.64 |
| Revenue growth | +4.4%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 0.6%barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 5.8%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 5.20% |
| Dividend yield | 424.00% |
| Debt to equity | 0.68moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 1.05adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.76steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.13% |
| 52-week range | 25.15 - 63.88 |
| Market cap | $2.2B |
| Employees | 25,400 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeMAN trades on the NYSE. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 8.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 23% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (9 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $36.
The framework has shifted from markdown to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 2.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 15% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (9 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $36.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (9 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $36. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (9 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $36. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (9 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $36. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 1.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (9 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $36. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (9 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $36. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 8.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (9 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $36. Since the last review it its composite score rose. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from accumulation to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 9.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (9 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $36.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- FCN Q3 Earnings & Revenues Top Estimates, Stock Gains 14.3% Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- Xerox Stock Plunges 40.3% Despite Q3 Earnings and Revenues Beat Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- Trane Technologies' Q3 Earnings Beat on Strong Commercial HVAC Demand Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- TAPFIN Marks Five Consecutive Years of Everest Group SOW PEAK Matrix® Leadership Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
- Eni and Burlington Stores have been highlighted as Zacks Bull and Bear of the Day Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-20 | Dave McCormick | Republican | buy | 250K–500K |
| 2026-10-14 | Dave McCormick | Republican | buy | 100K–250K |
| 2026-10-09 | Cleo Fields | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-10-09 | Cleo Fields | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-10-07 | Dave McCormick | Republican | buy | 250K–500K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $28.29 | +17.8% | $0.72 | $1,204 | +20.4% |
| 2 months | $26.32 | +26.7% | $0.72 | $1,294 | +29.4% |
| 3 months | $25.81 | +29.2% | $0.72 | $1,319 | +31.9% |
| 6 months | $27.89 | +19.5% | $0.72 | $1,221 | +22.1% |
| 1 year | $40.68 | -18.1% | $1.44 | $855 | -14.5% |
| 2 years | $64.32 | -48.2% | $3.70 | $576 | -42.4% |
| 3 years | $67.11 | -50.3% | $6.71 | $597 | -40.3% |
| 5 years | $101.10 | -67.0% | $12.16 | $450 | -55.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever MAN does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.