The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 3.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $7. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
GT · Nasdaq · USD · Market cap $1.3B · 63,000 employees
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, together with its subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, distributes, and sells tires and related products and services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 5 Nov 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-11-05 · the tape above runs as of 12:04 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price4.45 USD at the 5 Nov 2026 close
- Our value readUndervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Our regime readMarkdown, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans to puts (put/call 3.34)
- Last reviewed5 Nov 2026 (1 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $4.51 to $7.34, base estimate $5.84 (screen dated 2026-11-05).
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 3.34, read 2026-11-01
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company holds its Markdown at $4.45. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 132 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 132 days |
| Price at the screen | $4.45 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 8.06 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 1.24 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 39.85% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 39.9% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 17.26% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 17.3% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.20% | Below 5% | Only 0.2% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber's business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 40% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-11-05. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when GT's ethical verdict changes
Today GT does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Undervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026: it trades at roughly a 22% discount to our $5.84 fair value.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-11-05 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 23.8% discount to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 7 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +48% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $5.84, with a range of $4.51 to $7.34, dated to the 2026-11-05 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsGoodyear's Cheap Multiple Hides A Value Trap
Picture a tyre shop in a recession where every customer is delaying the new set until the old ones literally fall apart. Goodyear sits in exactly that spot. Revenue is already down 9 percent, margins sit at minus 12 percent and return on equity has collapsed to minus 50 percent. A forward multiple of 11 times looks tempting on the surface, yet the business is losing money and the market is only offering a hold rating with a $7 target barely above the current price. We pass.
The low multiple is the classic warning sign for a cyclical name, not an invitation. Peak earnings have already rolled over and the company has no visible moat to protect it once volumes recover. Ethical checks clear, but that single pass does not turn negative returns and shrinking sales into an investment case.
Risk sits in the continued erosion of volumes and pricing power across every major region. Without a clear path back to positive profit, the present valuation offers no margin of safety. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 8.1xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| EPS, trailing | -8.83 |
| EPS, forward | 0.56 |
| Revenue growth | -4.8%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | -14.4%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -61.5%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | 37.95% |
| Debt to equity | 2.74heavy leverage: higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.09adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.24moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.25% |
| 52-week range | 4.09 - 10.62 |
| Market cap | $1.3B |
| Employees | 63,000 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeGT trades on Nasdaq. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $7. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $7. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $7. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $7. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $7. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $7. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $7. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 5.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $7.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 9.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $7.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- CFOs On the Move: Week ending Oct. 30 Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- Goodyear (GT) Stock May Be Undervalued As Board News Shifts The Narrative Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- MICKEY THOMPSON GOES FULL THROTTLE FOR 2026 SEMA SHOW WITH NEW TIRES, WHEELS AND BUILDS Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- 1 cash-producing stock for long-term investors and 2 we find risky Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- 2 industrials stocks with exciting potential and 1 we avoid Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-06 | Diana Harshbarger | Republican | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-18 | Suzan DelBene | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-18 | Suzan DelBene | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-18 | Suzan DelBene | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-08-07 | Suzan DelBene | Democrat | buy | 250K–500K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $5.95 | -1.4% | · | $986 | -1.4% |
| 2 months | $7.10 | -17.4% | · | $826 | -17.4% |
| 3 months | $7.07 | -17.0% | · | $830 | -17.0% |
| 6 months | $8.82 | -33.5% | · | $665 | -33.5% |
| 1 year | $11.94 | -50.9% | · | $491 | -50.9% |
| 2 years | $11.93 | -50.8% | · | $492 | -50.8% |
| 3 years | $12.86 | -54.4% | · | $456 | -54.4% |
| 5 years | $18.75 | -68.7% | · | $313 | -68.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever GT does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.