The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 11.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 34%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Groupon, Inc.
GRPN · Nasdaq · USD · Market cap $725M · 1,734 employees
Groupon, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 4 Nov 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-11-04 · the tape above runs as of 20:03 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price17.31 USD at the 4 Nov 2026 close
- Our value readUndervalued vs our fair value, as of 4 Nov 2026
- Our regime readMarkdown, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans to puts (put/call 3.13)
- Last reviewed4 Nov 2026 (1 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $19.80 to $26.91, base estimate $22.31 (screen dated 2026-11-04).
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 3.13, read 2026-11-02
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Groupon, Inc. holds its Markdown at $17.31. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 29 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 29 days |
| Price at the screen | $17.31 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 9.22 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.28 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 52.15% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 52.1% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 48.01% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 48.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 1.19% | Below 5% | Only 1.2% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Groupon,'s business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 52% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-11-05. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when GRPN's ethical verdict changes
Today GRPN does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The quantitative screen above is arithmetic. Separately, community boycott lists cite this company: Documented on Ethical Consumer Boycotts List. The desk records that flag here without folding it into the verdict: the screen measures the balance sheet, the overlay informs the conscience, and they are different judgements that belong to different owners. The second one is yours.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Undervalued vs our fair value, as of 4 Nov 2026: it trades at roughly a 31% discount to our $22.31 fair value.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-11-04 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 22.4% discount to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 3 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +50% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $22.31, with a range of $19.80 to $26.91, dated to the 2026-11-04 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsDaily deals model fails to spark growth
Picture the inbox coupon that once felt like a clever hack. Groupon still runs that marketplace, linking shoppers to local discounts across beauty, food and services, yet the business now posts zero revenue growth and a 21 percent loss margin at a share price well above our fair value.
We pass because the numbers show no operating momentum and an unknown competitive edge. Forward earnings sit at 13.4 times, but flat sales and consistent losses leave little room for the multiple to hold when consumer habits have moved on.
Currency swings and execution risk remain real, even after clearing the ethical screen. The gap between price and fair value offers no cushion. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.2xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| EPS, trailing | -3.13 |
| EPS, forward | 2.07 |
| Revenue growth | -0.8%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | -25.3%currently unprofitable |
| FCF yield | 6.51% |
| Current ratio | 0.79below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.28barely tracks the market's swings |
| Short interest, float | 0.55% |
| 52-week range | 9.17 - 30.26 |
| Market cap | $725M |
| Employees | 1,734 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeGRPN trades on Nasdaq. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 1.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 34%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 34%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 34%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 2.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 34%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 34%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 34%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 12.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 34%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 34%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 34%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $16.87 | -5.4% | · | $946 | -5.4% |
| 2 months | $11.86 | +34.6% | · | $1,346 | +34.6% |
| 3 months | $9.66 | +65.2% | · | $1,652 | +65.2% |
| 6 months | $16.74 | -4.7% | · | $953 | -4.7% |
| 1 year | $32.61 | -51.1% | · | $489 | -51.1% |
| 2 years | $14.32 | +11.5% | · | $1,115 | +11.5% |
| 3 years | $5.22 | +205.8% | · | $3,058 | +205.8% |
| 5 years | $46.29 | -65.5% | · | $345 | -65.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever GRPN does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.