The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 1% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $151.
Citigroup
C · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $206.7B · 224,000 employees
Citigroup Inc., a diversified financial service holding company, provides various financial products and services to consumers, corporations, governments, and institutions.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 23 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quoteLast reviewed 5 days ago
Screened 2026-10-23 · the tape above runs as of 20:04 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price120.62 USD at the 23 Oct 2026 close
- Our ratingAvoid, current read distribution
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans slightly to calls (put/call 0.78)
- Last reviewed23 Oct 2026 (5 days ago)
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
What this means: price 120.62 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 170.00, over the last year.
- Trend Distribution
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning political selling, disclosed 2026-09-24
- Options put/call open interest 0.78, read 2026-10-27
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its distribution label.
Citigroup holds its Distribution at $120.62. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 124 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 124 days |
| Price at the screen | $120.62 |
| Valuation | 12.24 trailing · 9.42 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.11 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Financials sector | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Citigroup does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in conventional financial services, which the screen treats as interest-based, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-10-27. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when C's ethical verdict changes
Today C does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The quantitative screen above is arithmetic. Separately, community boycott lists cite this company: Cited by BDS movement for banking relationships and investment services connected to Israeli government entities and settlement-linked companies. The desk records that flag here without folding it into the verdict: the screen measures the balance sheet, the overlay informs the conscience, and they are different judgements that belong to different owners. The second one is yours.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 38% discount to our $170.00 fair value, narrow competitive moat, 8.00% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-10-23 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 38.0% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 21 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +28% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-10-23 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsThe Financial Giant That Falls Short Ethically
When you think of banking services, a behemoth like Citigroup might come to mind, a company that offers a vast array of financial products to a diverse clientele. However, despite its size and scope, Citigroup fails to meet our ethical standards, and that's why we're steering clear.
Citigroup's financial performance isn't the issue; with a forward P/E of 10.1x, it's trading at a discount to its peers, and boasts a 16% revenue growth and a 22% profit margin. The question mark is its narrow moat and a 9% ROE, which suggests a less competitive edge and subpar returns on equity.
Yet, the real reason we avoid Citigroup lies in its ethical shortcomings. Despite the consensus buy rating from 20 analysts and a median target of $158, our ethical screen shows a fail, specifically on the business activity screen. This means that while the numbers might look appealing, the underlying activities of the company do not align with our strict ethical criteria.
Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.4xfairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 12.2xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 10.07 |
| EPS, forward | 13.07 |
| Revenue growth | +8.0%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 23.2%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 9.4%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Dividend yield | 191.00% |
| Beta | 1.11moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.01% |
| 52-week range | 95.00 - 147.96 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $206.7B |
| Employees | 224,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeC trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from markdown to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 5.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $151.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $152. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 3.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $153. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $153. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $153. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from accumulation to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 3.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $155.
The framework has shifted from markdown to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 0.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $147.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 2.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $147.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 75%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $147.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Participation notification by Citigroup Inc. Yahoo Finance · 1d ago
- 3 Undervalued Stocks With P E Under 21 Yahoo Finance · 1d ago
- HSBC's Restructuring Strategy Delivers Results: Is More Upside Ahead? Yahoo Finance · 1d ago
- Two Citi / AAdvantage cards are getting a refresh — and higher fees Yahoo Finance · 1d ago
- Citi: small-cap short positioning nears historical extremes, lifting squeeze risk Yahoo Finance · 1d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-27 | Fraser Jane | CEO | Sale | 100,000 | $6,000,000 |
| 2026-05-26 | Mason Mark | CFO | Purchase | 10,000 | $595,000 |
| 2026-05-25 | Corbat Michael | Director | Award/Grant | 5,000 | · |
| 2026-05-24 | Forese James | Director | Option Exercise | 20,000 | $1,000,000 |
| 2026-05-23 | Gerspach John | CFO | Tax Withholding | 5,000 | $305,000 |
| 2026-05-22 | Crittenden Gary | Director | Gift | 2,000 | · |
| 2025-05-30 | Fraser Jane | CEO | Purchase | 50,000 | $2,900,000 |
| 2026-05-08 | DUGAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM | Director | 2,117 | $265,260 | |
| 2026-04-15 | SKYLER EDWARD | Officer | 25,000 | $3,285,350 | |
| 2026-04-15 | GILES NICOLE M. | Officer | 12,732 | $1,678,078 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-16 | Michael Rulli | Republican | sell | 50K–100K |
| 2026-10-16 | Michael Rulli | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-10-12 | David Taylor | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-10-12 | David Taylor | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-10-09 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $125.85 | +6.3% | · | $1,063 | +6.3% |
| 2 months | $123.80 | +8.0% | $0.60 | $1,085 | +8.5% |
| 3 months | $105.00 | +27.4% | $0.60 | $1,279 | +27.9% |
| 6 months | $110.64 | +20.9% | $1.20 | $1,220 | +22.0% |
| 1 year | $76.30 | +75.3% | $2.40 | $1,784 | +78.4% |
| 2 years | $58.10 | +130.2% | $4.64 | $2,382 | +138.2% |
| 3 years | $43.78 | +205.5% | $6.76 | $3,209 | +220.9% |
| 5 years | $64.33 | +107.9% | $10.84 | $2,248 | +124.8% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever C does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.