The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $40. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
UDR, Inc.
UDR · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $12.7B · 1,420 employees
UDR, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 23 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quoteLast reviewed 7 days ago
Screened 2026-10-23 · the tape above runs as of 10:08 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price35.84 USD at the 23 Oct 2026 close
- Our ratingAvoid, current read markup
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans heavily to calls (put/call 0.42)
- Last reviewed23 Oct 2026 (7 days ago)
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
What this means: price 35.84 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 23.02, over the last year.
- Trend Markup
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 0.42, read 2026-10-27
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markup label.
UDR, Inc. holds its Markup at $35.84. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 334 days.
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 334 days |
| Price at the screen | $35.84 |
| Valuation | 21.68 trailing · 61.18 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.71 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 56.61% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 56.6% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 8.36% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 8.4% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 1.43% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 1.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 1.12% | Below 5% | Only 1.1% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
UDR,'s business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 57% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-10-29. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when UDR's ethical verdict changes
Today UDR does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads AVOID: it trades above our $23.02 fair value estimate, moderate competitive moat.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-10-23 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 35.8% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 21 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +14% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-10-23 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsREIT rents look steady until debt mounts
Picture families paying rent on time every month while the landlord juggles heavy loans on every block. UDR trades at thirty nine dollars seventy six cents against our fair value of twenty three dollars fifty six cents, a forty one percent premium. Forward earnings sit at seventy one times on four percent revenue growth, and the ethical screen flags the debt ratio outright.
Moderate moat and twelve percent return on equity give little cover when profit margins rest at twenty eight percent. Residential REITs feel stable until rates stay high or vacancies creep up, turning yesterday's reliable cash flow into tomorrow's squeeze.
Analyst targets hover near forty one dollars yet the valuation gap and leverage breach keep us away. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 61.2xexpensive: the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Trailing P/E | 21.7xa premium valuation |
| EPS, trailing | 1.58 |
| EPS, forward | 0.56 |
| Revenue growth | -0.1%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 29.6%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 13.7%a solid return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 6.14% |
| Dividend yield | 469.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.56a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.18below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.71steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.05% |
| 52-week range | 32.94 - 42.00 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $12.7B |
| Employees | 1,420 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeUDR trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 4.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $40. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $40. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $40. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from markdown to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $40. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $40.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $40.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 4.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $40.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 7.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $40.
The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 2.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $40.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- What to Expect From UDR's Q3 2026 Earnings Report Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- Apollo (APO) Stock May Be Below Fair Value On Apartment Portfolio Deal Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- UDR and Apollo Form $2B Apartment Venture Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
- UDR, Inc. Raises Full-Year 2026 Guidance Ranges and Provides Preliminary Third Quarter 2026 Results Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
- UDR, Inc. and Apollo Form $2.0 Billion Strategic Partnership Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-12 | BENSON KEITH | Officer | 12,330 | · | |
| 2026-02-12 | BRAGG DAVID D. | Chief Financial Officer | 6,741 | · | |
| 2026-02-12 | TOOMEY THOMAS W | Chief Executive Officer | 92,646 | · | |
| 2026-01-02 | GOITIA ELLEN M. | Director | 5,451 | $199,997 | |
| 2026-01-02 | CATTANACH KATHERINE A | Director | 4,088 | $149,989 | |
| 2026-01-02 | MCNAMARA ROBERT A | Director | 5,451 | $199,997 | |
| 2025-12-30 | TOOMEY THOMAS W | Chief Executive Officer | 110,000 | $3,942,400 | |
| 2025-10-10 | GROVE JON ARTHUR | Director | 120,000 | · | |
| 2025-07-23 | BRAGG DAVID D. | Chief Financial Officer | 24,384 | $999,988 | |
| 2025-03-28 | TOOMEY THOMAS W | Chief Executive Officer | 125,000 | $5,509,625 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 2026-03-27 | Alan Armstrong | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2025-09-23 | Julie Johnson | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2025-09-23 | Julie Johnson | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2025-09-23 | Julie Johnson | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $37.15 | +5.9% | · | $1,059 | +5.9% |
| 2 months | $34.68 | +13.4% | $0.44 | $1,147 | +14.7% |
| 3 months | $35.59 | +10.5% | $0.44 | $1,117 | +11.7% |
| 6 months | $34.77 | +13.1% | $0.87 | $1,156 | +15.6% |
| 1 year | $40.03 | -1.8% | $1.73 | $1,026 | +2.6% |
| 2 years | $36.48 | +7.8% | $3.43 | $1,172 | +17.2% |
| 3 years | $37.30 | +5.5% | $5.12 | $1,192 | +19.2% |
| 5 years | $41.31 | -4.8% | $8.14 | $1,149 | +14.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever UDR does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.