The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 0.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $113.
Camden Property Trust CPT
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Camden Property Trust, an S&P 500 Company, is a real estate company.
read at $113.29
Camden Property Trust holds its Markup at $113.29.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 4 days |
| Price | $113.29 |
| Valuation | 31.65 trailing · 144.32 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.80 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $60.28 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
| Revenue growth | -0.50% |
| Profit margin | 24.49% |
| Debt to equity | 104.15 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 22 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 43.1% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Paying top dollar for flat rents and heavy debt
Everyone needs a roof over their head so apartment landlords should feel like a safe bet. Camden owns 172 US complexes yet trades at 143.9 times forward earnings with zero revenue growth and a profit margin that barely moves the needle. Our fair value sits at half the current price and the ethical screen already fails on debt levels.
That combination leaves almost no margin of safety and explains the avoid call. A narrow moat offers little protection when new supply or rising rates hit the sector. Twenty two analysts sit on hold with a target near the current quote but the gap between price and value remains wide.
Real estate cycles can turn quickly and high leverage amplifies the swings. The numbers simply do not support the valuation on offer today.
Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 144.3x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Trailing P/E | 31.6x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | -0.5% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 24.5% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 9.1% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.04 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.10 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.80 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $11.2B |
| Employees | 1,640 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in CPT's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
CPT trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $113.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | WESTBROOK KELVIN R | Director | 2,507 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | BENITO JAVIER | Director | 2,507 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | SEVILLA-SACASA FRANCES ALDRICH | Director | 2,507 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | BRUNNER HEATHER J | Director | 2,507 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | KHATOR RENU | Director | 2,507 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | INGRAHAM SCOTT S | Director | 2,507 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | GIBSON MARK DAVID | Director | 2,507 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | WEBSTER STEVEN ALAN | Director | 1,350 | · | |
| 2026-02-25 | CAMPO RICHARD J | Chief Executive Officer | 31,881 | $3,469,928 | |
| 2026-02-25 | GALLAGHER MICHAEL P | Officer | 4,034 | $439,061 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $104.92 | +10.4% | · | $1,104 | +10.4% |
| 2 months | $101.95 | +13.6% | · | $1,136 | +13.6% |
| 3 months | $100.64 | +15.1% | $1.06 | $1,161 | +16.1% |
| 6 months | $102.02 | +13.5% | $2.11 | $1,156 | +15.6% |
| 1 year | $113.47 | +2.1% | $4.21 | $1,058 | +5.8% |
| 2 years | $99.74 | +16.1% | $8.35 | $1,245 | +24.5% |
| 3 years | $100.83 | +14.9% | $12.38 | $1,271 | +27.1% |
| 5 years | $114.01 | +1.6% | $19.63 | $1,188 | +18.8% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.