The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 4%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $141.
Mid-America Apartment Communities MAA
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.is a S&P 500 company.
read at $135.64
Mid-America Apartment Communities holds its Accumulation at $135.64.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Accumulation label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 4 days |
| Price | $135.64 |
| Valuation | 40.49 trailing · 41.36 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.73 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $86.26 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat, 0.80% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 0.80% |
| Profit margin | 17.60% |
| Debt to equity | 99.83 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 25 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 45.3% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.3% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.5% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
High price for sluggish apartment returns
Picture a landlord charging top rent while occupancy inches up at one percent a year. That is the setup with this residential REIT. Shares sit well above our fair value with a forward multiple of 40.5 times earnings, yet revenue growth barely registers and return on equity is just seven percent. The narrow moat and ethical screen failure on debt levels seal the case to pass.
Analysts see a hold and a median target only modestly above the current price, but the numbers do not support chasing it. Profit margins at eighteen percent look ordinary for the sector and offer little cushion if interest costs rise further. Low growth plus stretched valuation rarely ends well for patient capital.
The real concern sits with leverage. Debt ratios already breach our ethical screen, leaving little room if rents soften or refinancing costs climb. This looks like a classic value trap dressed up as stability. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 41.4x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 40.5x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 0.8% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 17.6% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 6.7% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.00 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 0.08 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.73 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $16.2B |
| Employees | 2,507 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in MAA's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
MAA trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-21 | FISCHER TAMARA D. | Director | 1,100 | $141,400 | |
| 2026-05-19 | GRAF ALAN B JR | Director | 1,401 | · | |
| 2026-05-19 | CAPLAN DEBORAH H. | Director | 1,401 | · | |
| 2026-04-06 | CARPENTER MELANIE | Officer | 731 | $91,214 | |
| 2026-04-06 | ARGO TIMOTHY | Officer | 183 | $22,826 | |
| 2026-04-06 | HOLDER AUBREY CLAY | Chief Financial Officer | 145 | $18,086 | |
| 2026-04-06 | FAIRBANKS AMBER | Officer | 711 | $88,683 | |
| 2026-04-01 | DELPRIORE ROBERT J | General Counsel | 5,093 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | CARPENTER MELANIE | Officer | 1,439 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | HILL ADRIAN | Chief Investment Officer | 10,907 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $129.72 | +8.0% | · | $1,080 | +8.0% |
| 2 months | $124.86 | +12.2% | $1.53 | $1,134 | +13.4% |
| 3 months | $126.20 | +11.0% | $1.53 | $1,122 | +12.2% |
| 6 months | $129.88 | +7.9% | $3.06 | $1,102 | +10.2% |
| 1 year | $145.19 | -3.5% | $6.09 | $1,007 | +0.7% |
| 2 years | $127.25 | +10.1% | $12.06 | $1,196 | +19.6% |
| 3 years | $135.94 | +3.1% | $17.80 | $1,161 | +16.1% |
| 5 years | $143.00 | -2.1% | $27.33 | $1,171 | +17.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.