The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 35% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 103%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 43%. The street (8 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $100.
Mercury Systems, Inc. MRCY
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Mercury Systems, Inc., a technology company, manufactures and sells components, products, modules, and subsystems for defense prime contractors, original equipment manufacturers, government, and commercial aerospace companies.
read at $96.08
Mercury Systems, Inc. holds its Markup at $96.08.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 1 days |
| Price | $96.08 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 62.16 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 0.93 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 11.50% |
| Profit margin | -1.46% |
| Debt to equity | 44.43 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 8 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited business activity: aerospace & defense. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited business activity: Aerospace & Defense Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Defence Electronics Name Fails Both Price and Ethics
Every missile guidance module or radar subassembly that reaches a prime contractor has to come from somewhere, and Mercury Systems sits in that supply chain. We pass on the name anyway. The ethical screen blocks any exposure to aerospace and defence work outright, and the numbers give no reason to argue the point. Revenue is rising 12 percent yet margins sit at minus 1 percent, return on equity is also negative, and the forward multiple is 62 times. Fair value sits at 65 dollars against a 96 dollar price, so the market is already paying a large premium for thin results.
Analyst targets cluster around 106 dollars and the consensus reads buy, yet those calls ignore the ethical line we draw. The business shows no obvious moat and is burning cash rather than compounding it. High multiples on negative profits usually signal hope rather than proof.
Risk centres on further cash burn if defence budgets shift or prime contractors squeeze suppliers harder. Currency and contract timing can swing results quickly in this sector. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 62.2x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Revenue growth | 11.5% steady growth |
| Profit margin | -1.5% currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -1.0% not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 0.44 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 3.19 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.93 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $5.8B |
| Employees | 2,117 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in MRCY's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
MRCY trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $91.95 | +16.1% | · | $1,161 | +16.1% |
| 2 months | $79.60 | +34.2% | · | $1,342 | +34.2% |
| 3 months | $81.44 | +31.1% | · | $1,311 | +31.1% |
| 6 months | $76.61 | +39.4% | · | $1,394 | +39.4% |
| 1 year | $52.52 | +103.3% | · | $2,033 | +103.3% |
| 2 years | $30.71 | +247.8% | · | $3,478 | +247.8% |
| 3 years | $42.83 | +149.4% | · | $2,494 | +149.4% |
| 5 years | $66.98 | +59.4% | · | $1,594 | +59.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.