The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 22%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $69.
Las Vegas Sands LVS
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Las Vegas Sands Corp., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, and operates integrated resorts in Macao and Singapore.
read at $47.76
Las Vegas Sands holds its Distribution at $47.76.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 60 days |
| Price | $47.76 |
| Valuation | 18.51 trailing · 13.43 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.82 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 45% discount to our $69.11 fair value, moderate competitive moat.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | -0.70% |
| Profit margin | 12.59% |
| Debt to equity | 1,706.36 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 19 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity screen. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Business activity: Casinos & Gaming Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Macau Casinos Look Cheap But Fail Ethics
Picture the ferry from Hong Kong pulling into Macau, packed with day trippers chasing the slots and baccarat tables inside Venetian and Parisian resorts. Las Vegas Sands runs those integrated casinos across Macau and Singapore, a business that posted 25% revenue growth and a 13% profit margin last year.
We pass anyway. The 12.4x forward earnings multiple and 90% ROE look attractive on paper, yet the stock fails our business activity screen outright. Moderate moat or not, that single ethical breach ends the conversation before valuation enters the room.
Cyclical demand tied to Chinese travel policy adds real volatility, and any slowdown in high-roller volumes would hit earnings fast. Nineteen analysts still lean buy with a $67 median target, but the ethical red flag overrides the apparent margin of safety. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.4x reasonably valued |
| Trailing P/E | 18.5x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | -0.7% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 12.6% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 122.9% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 17.06 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.00 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.82 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $31.6B |
| Employees | 41,000 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on LVS
- › MGM Resorts Could be Headed for a Sale as Casino Stocks Become Hot Takeover Targets Barrons.com · 16d ago
- › Las Vegas Sands (LVS) Joins 2026 Nevada Youth Homelessness Summit After 10 Years Of Advocacy Simply Wall St. · 17d ago
- › Las Vegas Sands (LVS) Stock Could Be 18% Expensive Following Macau Revenue Pressure Simply Wall St. · 17d ago
- › Same Price, Much Better Business: The LVS Gap Trefis · 19d ago
- › 9 Stocks Are Down But Not Out — Analysts Predict Big Comebacks Investor's Business Daily · 19d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in LVS's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
LVS trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | LI ALAIN | Director | 3,948 | · | |
| 2026-05-14 | PANT MUKTESH | Director | 3,948 | · | |
| 2026-05-14 | KRAMER LEWIS | Director | 3,948 | · | |
| 2026-05-14 | BESCA MARK M. | Director | 3,948 | · | |
| 2026-05-14 | CHAFETZ IRWIN | Director | 3,948 | · | |
| 2026-05-14 | FORMAN CHARLES D | Director | 3,948 | · | |
| 2026-05-14 | CHAU MICHELINE | Director | 3,948 | · | |
| 2026-04-27 | FORMAN CHARLES D | Director | 11,400 | $616,626 | |
| 2026-03-17 | DUMONT PATRICK | Chief Executive Officer | 60,165 | $3,294,034 | |
| 2026-03-17 | DUMONT PATRICK | Chief Executive Officer | 61,740 | $3,243,202 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $52.07 | -2.5% | · | $976 | -2.5% |
| 2 months | $53.14 | -4.4% | $0.30 | $962 | -3.8% |
| 3 months | $53.37 | -4.8% | $0.30 | $957 | -4.3% |
| 6 months | $65.48 | -22.4% | $0.60 | $785 | -21.5% |
| 1 year | $41.66 | +21.9% | $1.10 | $1,246 | +24.6% |
| 2 years | $42.91 | +18.4% | $2.00 | $1,230 | +23.0% |
| 3 years | $55.23 | -8.0% | $2.80 | $970 | -3.0% |
| 5 years | $52.54 | -3.3% | $2.80 | $1,020 | +2.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.