Framework Journal · one stock, one dated entry

Recorded 2026-07-27 · Permanent

Las Vegas Sands logoLas Vegas Sands LVS

Outside both standards

An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.

In plain words · Las Vegas Sands Corp., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, and operates integrated resorts in Macao and Singapore.

The label
Distribution

read at $47.76

Las Vegas Sands holds its Distribution at $47.76.

PHINPOOPSC
  • PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
  • INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
  • POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
  • OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
  • SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
  • edge confirmed
  • edge broken
  • edge forming

Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.

The investor read · the season, not the day

As held on the ledger · 2026-07-27
PhaseDistribution · caution
Quantitative stateThe statistical read favours the sellers, held for 60 days
Price$47.76
Valuation18.51 trailing · 13.43 forward price to earnings
Values screenFAIL · score 10.0
Beta0.82

The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth

Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 45% discount to our $69.11 fair value, moderate competitive moat.

Read at
$47.76
18.51 P/E · 13.43 fwd
Our fair value
$69.11
45% discount
Analyst target (avg)
$60.00
+26% to current
Target low $47.00Analyst target rangeTarget high $71.50
▲ current $47.76 · | average target

Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going

$73.9$56.6$39.3TODAY5y agoPROJECTIONAnalyst high$71.50 +41%Our fair value$69.11 +36%Analyst avg$60.00 +18%Conservative$58.67 +16%

The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street

Current
$47.76
you are here
Conservative
$58.67
+23%
Analyst avg
$60.00
+26%
Our fair value
$69.11
+45%
Analyst high
$71.50
+50%

Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.

Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.

Revenue growth-0.70%
Profit margin12.59%
Debt to equity1,706.36
Analyst consensusBuy · 19 covering

Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.

The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English

This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:

The common standard · AAOIFI
Used by most halal investing apps
✗ DOES NOT PASS
Our stricter standard · asset-based
The one Titan applies
✗ DOES NOT PASS

Why it fails. The problem is its business activity screen. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.

What these two standards are, and how they differ →

  • Business activity Business activity: Casinos & Gaming Fail

Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.

The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean

Macau Casinos Look Cheap But Fail Ethics

Picture the ferry from Hong Kong pulling into Macau, packed with day trippers chasing the slots and baccarat tables inside Venetian and Parisian resorts. Las Vegas Sands runs those integrated casinos across Macau and Singapore, a business that posted 25% revenue growth and a 13% profit margin last year.

We pass anyway. The 12.4x forward earnings multiple and 90% ROE look attractive on paper, yet the stock fails our business activity screen outright. Moderate moat or not, that single ethical breach ends the conversation before valuation enters the room.

Cyclical demand tied to Chinese travel policy adds real volatility, and any slowdown in high-roller volumes would hit earnings fast. Nineteen analysts still lean buy with a $67 median target, but the ethical red flag overrides the apparent margin of safety. Analysis, not advice.

The fundamentals · plain-English read
Forward P/E13.4x
reasonably valued
Trailing P/E18.5x
reasonably valued
Revenue growth-0.7%
revenue is shrinking
Profit margin12.6%
thin but positive margins
Return on equity122.9%
an exceptional return on shareholder capital
Debt to equity17.06
heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens
Current ratio1.00
below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets
Beta0.82
steadier than the market
Market cap$31.6B
Employees41,000

The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.

Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.

Latest news · what the market is reading on LVS

Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.

Related securities · others in LVS's space worth a look

Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.

Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are

LVS trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.

The trader read · the latest dated commentary

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 22%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $69. Entered 2026-07-18 · Markdown

The dated journal · newest first, never edited

2026-07-18 Markdown $50.25 +0.0% Entry 3

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 22%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $69.

2026-07-03 Markdown $50.25 +0.0% Entry 2

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.

2026-07-02 Markdown $50.25 Entry 1

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.

Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.

The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed

Most recent filings · LVS
DateInsiderTitleTypeSharesValue
2026-05-14 LI ALAIN Director 3,948 ·
2026-05-14 PANT MUKTESH Director 3,948 ·
2026-05-14 KRAMER LEWIS Director 3,948 ·
2026-05-14 BESCA MARK M. Director 3,948 ·
2026-05-14 CHAFETZ IRWIN Director 3,948 ·
2026-05-14 FORMAN CHARLES D Director 3,948 ·
2026-05-14 CHAU MICHELINE Director 3,948 ·
2026-04-27 FORMAN CHARLES D Director 11,400 $616,626
2026-03-17 DUMONT PATRICK Chief Executive Officer 60,165 $3,294,034
2026-03-17 DUMONT PATRICK Chief Executive Officer 61,740 $3,243,202

Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.

What holding actually paid · price plus dividends

If $1,000 had been placed · historical, not a promise
PeriodPrice thenPrice returnDivs per share$1,000 becameTotal return
1 month $52.07 -2.5% · $976 -2.5%
2 months $53.14 -4.4% $0.30 $962 -3.8%
3 months $53.37 -4.8% $0.30 $957 -4.3%
6 months $65.48 -22.4% $0.60 $785 -21.5%
1 year $41.66 +21.9% $1.10 $1,246 +24.6%
2 years $42.91 +18.4% $2.00 $1,230 +23.0%
3 years $55.23 -8.0% $2.80 $970 -3.0%
5 years $52.54 -3.3% $2.80 $1,020 +2.0%

Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever LVS does next, these words stay.

Las Vegas Sands · LVS · Distribution · $47.76
Recorded 2026-07-27 · before the outcome · scored mechanically

Get our weekly market brief free.