The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 0.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (15 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $94.
Boyd Gaming Corporation BYD
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Boyd Gaming Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a multi-jurisdictional gaming company in the United States and Canada.
read at $85.06
Boyd Gaming Corporation holds its Markup at $85.06.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 220 days |
| Price | $85.06 |
| Valuation | 3.77 trailing · 10.96 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 1.08 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 0.00% |
| Profit margin | 44.34% |
| Debt to equity | 115.27 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 16 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited keyword in sector/industry: casino. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: casino Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Casinos clear the numbers but not the screen
Walk into any Las Vegas property on a busy weekend and the cash registers still ring, yet Boyd Gaming lands on the wrong side of our ethical screen because the whole sector is off limits. We pass outright.
The numbers look tidy on the surface, with a forward multiple of 11.2 times, a 45 percent profit margin and 94 percent return on equity, but revenue is crawling at just 1 percent and the shares already sit 7 percent above our fair value of 81.24 dollars. That low multiple on a consumer cyclical is usually a warning rather than a bargain.
High returns can vanish fast when discretionary spending turns, and the ethical red flag removes any temptation to dig deeper. Consensus targets sit higher but we apply our own lens here. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 11.0x reasonably valued |
| Trailing P/E | 3.8x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Revenue growth | 0.0% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 44.3% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Debt to equity | 1.15 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Beta | 1.08 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $6.3B |
| Employees | 16,009 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in BYD's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
BYD trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (15 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $94.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $82.75 | +5.3% | · | $1,053 | +5.3% |
| 2 months | $86.50 | +0.8% | · | $1,008 | +0.8% |
| 3 months | $81.10 | +7.5% | $0.20 | $1,077 | +7.7% |
| 6 months | $84.01 | +3.7% | $0.38 | $1,042 | +4.2% |
| 1 year | $74.34 | +17.2% | $0.74 | $1,182 | +18.2% |
| 2 years | $51.36 | +69.7% | $1.43 | $1,725 | +72.5% |
| 3 years | $66.38 | +31.3% | $2.08 | $1,344 | +34.4% |
| 5 years | $60.13 | +44.9% | $2.84 | $1,496 | +49.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.