The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 39%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 41%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $112.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions Inc KTOS
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc., a technology company, provides technology, hardware, products, system, and software for the defense, national security, and commercial markets in the United States, other North…
read at $46.17
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions Inc holds its Distribution at $46.17.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 5 days |
| Price | $46.17 |
| Valuation | 271.59 trailing · 42.31 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 1.07 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 22.60% |
| Profit margin | 2.08% |
| Debt to equity | 5.44 |
| Analyst consensus | Strong Buy · 21 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its excluded industry: aerospace & defense. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Excluded industry: Aerospace & Defense Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Kratos flies in a sector we screen out
Kratos makes the unmanned systems and electronic warfare gear that modern militaries rely on. That places the business squarely inside an excluded industry, so the ethical screen ends the conversation before valuation or growth enter the picture. We pass.
The company shows 23% revenue growth and trades at a 42x forward earnings multiple against a 2% profit margin and 1% return on equity. Narrow moat and 21 analysts calling for strong buy do not change the industry exclusion. The numbers can look attractive on paper, yet the screen exists for a reason.
Ignoring the ethical filter would expose the portfolio to sectors that create long term reputational and regulatory drag. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 42.3x priced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 271.6x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 22.6% strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | 2.1% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 1.2% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.05 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 5.63 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.07 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $8.7B |
| Employees | 4,300 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in KTOS's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $56.99 | -4.0% | · | $960 | -4.0% |
| 2 months | $70.34 | -22.2% | · | $778 | -22.2% |
| 3 months | $89.46 | -38.9% | · | $611 | -38.9% |
| 6 months | $78.78 | -30.6% | · | $694 | -30.6% |
| 1 year | $39.30 | +39.2% | · | $1,392 | +39.2% |
| 2 years | $20.46 | +167.4% | · | $2,674 | +167.4% |
| 3 years | $14.25 | +283.9% | · | $3,839 | +283.9% |
| 5 years | $26.20 | +108.8% | · | $2,088 | +108.8% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.