The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is holding around 92% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 450%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 56%. The street (10 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $40.
Planet Labs PBC PL
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Planet Labs PBC engages in the design, construction, and launch of constellations of satellites with the intent of providing high-cadence geospatial data delivered to customers through an online platform in the United St…
read at $20.22
Planet Labs PBC holds its Distribution at $20.22.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 7 days |
| Price | $20.22 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 6,072.07 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 2.07 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 42.10% |
| Profit margin | -111.17% |
| Debt to equity | 109.99 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 10 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its excluded industry: aerospace & defense. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Excluded industry: Aerospace & Defense Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Satellites promise daily earth views but ethics block
Picture a fleet of small satellites beaming fresh photos of every corner of the globe each day. Planet Labs built that network to sell the data to governments and firms. We pass because the business fails our ethical screen on aerospace and defence work.
Revenue is growing fast yet the company still loses more than a dollar for every dollar earned, with returns on equity deeply negative. The shares trade well above our fair value and carry a forward multiple that leaves no margin for error. The narrow moat offers little protection against those realities.
Analyst price targets look optimistic on paper alone. The industry exclusion remains firm regardless of growth or sentiment. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 6,072.1x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Revenue growth | 42.1% growing very fast |
| Profit margin | -111.2% currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -84.0% not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 1.10 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 2.81 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 2.07 much more volatile than the market |
| Market cap | $7.2B |
| Employees | 945 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in PL's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 8 May2026 | Rick Allen | Republican | sell | 15K–50K |
| 8 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 7 May2026 | Tim Moore | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 7 May2026 | Tim Moore | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $41.84 | -26.5% | · | $735 | -26.5% |
| 2 months | $34.67 | -11.3% | · | $887 | -11.3% |
| 3 months | $24.97 | +23.2% | · | $1,232 | +23.2% |
| 6 months | $17.47 | +76.1% | · | $1,761 | +76.1% |
| 1 year | $5.59 | +450.4% | · | $5,504 | +450.4% |
| 2 years | $2.07 | +1,386.2% | · | $14,862 | +1,386.2% |
| 3 years | $3.41 | +802.2% | · | $9,022 | +802.2% |
| 5 years | $9.95 | +209.0% | · | $3,090 | +209.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.