The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 6% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 32%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 28%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $388.
Huntington Ingalls Industries HII
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
read at $269.13
Huntington Ingalls Industries holds its Distribution at $269.13.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 14 days |
| Price | $269.13 |
| Valuation | 17.49 trailing · 13.34 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.25 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 42% discount to our $381.73 fair value, weak competitive moat, 13.40% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 13.40% |
| Profit margin | 4.71% |
| Debt to equity | 56.95 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 11 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity screen. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Business activity: Aerospace & Defense Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Warship Builder Trips Hard Ethical Screen
Every time Congress votes through another carrier or destroyer, the work lands at Huntington Ingalls. The company turns those budgets into steel hulls and combat systems, yet the ethical screen rules it out on business activity grounds alone.
We pass for the same reason we passed on other defence names that clear the numbers test. Revenue is growing 13 percent, the forward multiple sits at 13.3 times, and margins are thin at 5 percent with a weak moat. None of that matters once the screen lights up red.
The 12 percent return on equity and buy-rated analyst targets do not change the call. This screen exists to keep certain exposures off the desk, full stop. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.3x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 17.5x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 13.4% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 4.7% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 12.2% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.57 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 1.19 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.25 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $10.6B |
| Employees | 44,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in HII's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
HII trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-01 | KELLY ANASTASI D | Director | 123 | $48,378 | |
| 2026-04-01 | DENAULT LEO PAUL | Director | 123 | $48,378 | |
| 2026-04-01 | COLLINS AUGUSTUS L. | Director | 123 | $48,378 | |
| 2026-04-01 | MCKIBBEN TRACY B. | Director | 123 | $48,378 | |
| 2026-04-01 | DONALD KIRKLAND H | Director | 123 | $48,378 | |
| 2026-04-01 | HARKER VICTORIA D | Director | 123 | $48,378 | |
| 2026-04-01 | JIMENEZ FRANK R | Director | 123 | $48,378 | |
| 2026-04-01 | STANAGE NICKIE LEE | Director | 123 | $48,378 | |
| 2026-04-01 | O'SULLIVAN STEPHANIE L. | Director | 123 | $48,378 | |
| 2026-04-01 | FALLER CRAIG S | Director | 123 | $48,378 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-05 | Brian Babin | Republican | Sale | 15K–50K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $316.38 | -8.6% | $1.38 | $919 | -8.1% |
| 2 months | $392.71 | -26.3% | $1.38 | $740 | -26.0% |
| 3 months | $412.78 | -29.9% | $1.38 | $704 | -29.6% |
| 6 months | $324.30 | -10.8% | $2.76 | $901 | -9.9% |
| 1 year | $219.59 | +31.7% | $5.49 | $1,342 | +34.2% |
| 2 years | $237.75 | +21.7% | $10.84 | $1,262 | +26.2% |
| 3 years | $202.21 | +43.1% | $15.98 | $1,510 | +51.0% |
| 5 years | $198.22 | +45.9% | $25.56 | $1,588 | +58.8% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.