The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (30 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $406.
Domino's
DPZ · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $10.2B · 6,200 employees
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 23 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quoteLast reviewed 5 days ago
Screened 2026-10-23 · the tape above runs as of 20:04 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price313.61 USD at the 23 Oct 2026 close
- Our ratingAvoid, current read markup
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans to puts (put/call 1.02)
- Last reviewed23 Oct 2026 (5 days ago)
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
What this means: price 313.61 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 356.86, over the last year.
- Trend Markup
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning political buying, disclosed 2026-09-25
- Options put/call open interest 1.02, read 2026-10-24
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markup label.
Domino's holds its Markup at $313.61. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 515 days.
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 515 days |
| Price at the screen | $313.61 |
| Valuation | 17.00 trailing · 14.95 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.95 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 294.11% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 294.1% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 2.10% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 2.1% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 25.73% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 25.7% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.30% | Below 5% | Only 0.3% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Domino's's business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 294% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-10-27. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when DPZ's ethical verdict changes
Today DPZ does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The quantitative screen above is arithmetic. Separately, community boycott lists cite this company: Cited in consumer boycott campaigns for franchise pizza delivery operations in Israel. The desk records that flag here without folding it into the verdict: the screen measures the balance sheet, the overlay informs the conscience, and they are different judgements that belong to different owners. The second one is yours.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 16% discount to our $356.86 fair value, 3.40% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-10-23 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 15.6% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 27 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +12% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-10-23 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsPizza deliveries cannot hide the debt load
Picture a late night order landing at the door. The franchised network behind it carries too much debt, so Domino's fails our ethical screen and we pass, even with shares below our fair value estimate.
Revenue edges ahead at 4 percent while margins sit at 12 percent and the forward multiple is 15.5 times earnings. Analysts see further upside yet the debt ratio rules the name out for us.
That leverage leaves the business exposed if consumer spending slows in this cyclical sector, turning modest growth into a cash strain. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 15.0xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 17.0xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 18.15 |
| EPS, forward | 20.64 |
| Revenue growth | +3.4%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 12.0%thin but positive margins |
| FCF yield | 5.57% |
| Dividend yield | 246.00% |
| Current ratio | 0.49below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.95steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.09% |
| 52-week range | 282.00 - 442.35 |
| Market cap | $10.2B |
| Employees | 6,200 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeDPZ trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (30 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $406.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (30 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $406. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 2.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (30 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $406. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (30 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $406. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (30 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $406. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 13.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (30 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $406.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 8.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (30 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $406.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 2.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (30 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $406.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (30 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $406.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Is Improved Earnings Altering The Investment Case For Domino's Pizza (DPZ)? Yahoo Finance · 5d ago
- What Pool (POOL) Said on Its Q3 Earnings Call Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
- Broken Yolk Cafe Names Bodine Berger Director of Franchise Development Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
- Wingstop Stock Sinks as Wall Street Slashes Outlook. A Sales Recovery Looks Elusive. Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- Building the Ultimate Game Night: Domino's® and Minecraft Dungeons II Team Up for a Block-Shaped Collaboration Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | GARCIA KELLY E | Chief Technology Officer | 488 | $66,802 | |
| 2026-04-30 | GARCIA KELLY E | Chief Technology Officer | 488 | $162,167 | |
| 2026-04-21 | FEDERICO RICHARD L | Director | 515 | · | |
| 2026-04-21 | BRANDON DAVID A. | Director | 515 | · | |
| 2026-04-21 | BARRY CORIE S | Director | 515 | · | |
| 2026-04-21 | CAFRITZ DIANE LONG | Director | 515 | · | |
| 2026-04-21 | LOPEZ-GARCIA PATRICIA E | Director | 515 | · | |
| 2026-04-21 | KRAMER STEPHEN HOWARD | Director | 515 | · | |
| 2026-04-21 | BALSON ANDREW B | Director | 515 | · | |
| 2026-03-13 | HEADEN CYNTHIA A. | Officer | 738 | $292,617 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-25 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-25 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-18 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-18 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-05-27 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $313.22 | +1.0% | · | $1,010 | +1.0% |
| 2 months | $365.95 | -13.6% | · | $865 | -13.6% |
| 3 months | $393.99 | -19.7% | $1.99 | $808 | -19.2% |
| 6 months | $429.75 | -26.4% | $3.73 | $745 | -25.5% |
| 1 year | $447.90 | -29.4% | $7.21 | $722 | -27.8% |
| 2 years | $510.63 | -38.0% | $13.48 | $646 | -35.4% |
| 3 years | $285.20 | +10.9% | $18.62 | $1,174 | +17.4% |
| 5 years | $424.14 | -25.4% | $27.05 | $810 | -19.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever DPZ does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.