The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 9.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (21 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $97.
Deckers Brands
DECK · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $10.9B · 5,500 employees
Deckers Outdoor Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, designs, markets, and distributes footwear, apparel, and accessories for casual lifestyle use and high-performance activities in the United States and internationally.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 5 Nov 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-11-05 · the tape above runs as of 18:01 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price87.74 USD at the 5 Nov 2026 close
- Our value readUndervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Our regime readAccumulation, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans to puts (put/call 1.32)
- Last reviewed5 Nov 2026 (1 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $84.85 to $141.42, base estimate $104.07 (screen dated 2026-11-05).
- Trend Accumulation
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning political buying, disclosed 2026-09-25
- Options put/call open interest 1.32, read 2026-11-01
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its accumulation label.
Deckers Brands holds its Accumulation at $87.74. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 136 days.
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 136 days |
| Price at the screen | $87.74 |
| Valuation | 10.86 trailing · 10.02 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.12 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Accounts receivable
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 7.76% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is just 7.8% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling: it does not run on borrowed money. | Pass |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 62.24% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 62.2% of assets, above the 49% limit. | Fail |
| Revenue purity | 1.37% | Below 5% | Only 1.4% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Deckers Brands's business is fine, but its receivables are about 62% of its assets, well over the ~49% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-11-05. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when DECK's ethical verdict changes
Today DECK does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Undervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026: it trades at roughly a 14% discount to our $104.07 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 3.50% revenue growth.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-11-05 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 15.7% discount to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 21 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +8% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $104.07, with a range of $84.85 to $141.42, dated to the 2026-11-05 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsWhy it stands out
A 4%-growth business trading at just 10.0x forward earnings, with a moderate competitive moat and minimal debt. That is a 14% discount to our $104.07 fair value: the market is pricing it cautiously while the fundamentals argue otherwise. 21 analysts rate it Hold with a $95.00 average target, about 8% above the screened price.
| Forward P/E | 10.0xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 10.9xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 7.55 |
| EPS, forward | 8.18 |
| Revenue growth | +3.5%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 19.0%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 44.3%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.23minimal debt: a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 2.72comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.12moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.09% |
| 52-week range | 77.20 - 122.29 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $10.9B |
| Employees | 5,500 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeDECK trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 5.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (21 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $97.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $115. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $117. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $118. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $118. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $118. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 1.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $118. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 4.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $118. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 5.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $120. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Michael Burry Portfolio: Top 5 Stock Picks Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- Deckers Outdoor (DECK) vs. ONON and NKE: Can UGG and HOKA Growth Drive a Major Re-Rating? Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- Crocs Soars 18% on Third Straight Guidance Raise as HEYDUDE Hits “An Important Milestone” Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- Is Lululemon Stock Worth More Than Its Competitors? Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- Should You Wait Before Buying Lululemon Stock? Yahoo Finance · 10d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-02 | SHANAHAN LAURI M. | Director | 359 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | CHAN NELSON C | Director | 359 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | DAVIS CINDY L | Director | 359 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | STEWART BONITA C | Director | 359 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | LUIS VICTOR | Director | 644 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | BURWICK DAVID A | Director | 359 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | FIGUEREO JUAN R | Director | 359 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | GRISMER PATRICK J | Director | 359 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH | Director | 570 | · | |
| 2026-02-13 | SPANGENBERG ANNE | Officer | 4,063 | $471,389 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-25 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-25 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-25 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-18 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-18 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $96.65 | +15.0% | · | $1,150 | +15.0% |
| 2 months | $107.86 | +3.0% | · | $1,030 | +3.0% |
| 3 months | $100.69 | +10.4% | · | $1,104 | +10.4% |
| 6 months | $101.36 | +9.6% | · | $1,096 | +9.6% |
| 1 year | $110.00 | +1.0% | · | $1,010 | +1.0% |
| 2 years | $175.82 | -36.8% | · | $632 | -36.8% |
| 3 years | $81.39 | +36.5% | · | $1,365 | +36.5% |
| 5 years | $55.74 | +99.4% | · | $1,994 | +99.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever DECK does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.