The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 10% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $31.
Franklin Resources
BEN · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $15.7B · 10,000 employees
Franklin Resources, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 28 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-10-28 · the tape above runs as of 02:01 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price31.73 USD at the 28 Oct 2026 close
- Our ratingAvoid, current read markdown
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans heavily to calls (put/call 0.19)
- Last reviewed28 Oct 2026 (1 days ago)
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
What this means: price 31.73 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 40.00, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 0.19, read 2026-10-27
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Franklin Resources holds its Markdown at $31.73. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 2 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 2 days |
| Price at the screen | $31.73 |
| Valuation | 21.07 trailing · 9.82 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.58 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Financials sector | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Franklin Resources does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in conventional financial services, which the screen treats as interest-based, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-10-28. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when BEN's ethical verdict changes
Today BEN does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 26% discount to our $40.00 fair value, narrow competitive moat, 14.30% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-10-28 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 26.1% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 13 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +10% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-10-28 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsFranklin stumbles on the ethical line
Picture a fund house that cannot clear its own gate. Franklin Resources fails the business activity screen outright, so we pass regardless of the numbers. The ethical bar is not optional and this one does not clear it.
Revenue is growing at 9 percent and the forward multiple sits at 10.5 times, yet return on equity is only 7 percent and margins are thin at 8 percent. A narrow moat and a hold rating from analysts leave little margin for error once the ethical issue is stripped away. We are staying away.
The main risk is that the ethical failure is permanent while the low multiple reflects exactly that problem. Asset managers live or die on trust, and here the numbers simply cannot override the screen. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.8xcheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 21.1xa premium valuation |
| EPS, trailing | 1.47 |
| EPS, forward | 3.16 |
| Revenue growth | +14.3%steady growth |
| Profit margin | 8.7%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 7.9%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | -19.00% |
| Dividend yield | 425.00% |
| Debt to equity | 0.25minimal debt: a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 5.49comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.58much more volatile than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.05% |
| 52-week range | 21.11 - 36.28 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $15.7B |
| Employees | 10,000 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeBEN trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 3.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 12% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $31.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 2.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 28% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $31.
The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 4.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 28% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $31.
Our analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 5.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 28% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $31.
Our analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 4.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 28% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $31.
Our analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 28% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $31.
Our analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Our analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Franklin Templeton Prepares Nasdaq Debut For ETFs That Turn Stock Dividends Into Bitcoin Yahoo Finance · 5d ago
- Franklin Templeton Just Put $150 Million on the XRP Ledger. Why Is It All in One Wallet? Yahoo Finance · 5d ago
- Franklin Templeton Canada Announces ETF Cash Distributions Yahoo Finance · 5d ago
- Blackstone’s Profits Fell, but Its Stock Rose 4%. Here’s What Dividend Investors See Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
- A 14.9% Dividend Yield Sounds Great. Western Union Shows Why It Could Be a Trap Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-04 | NOTO ANTHONY J. | Director | 7,593 | $205,011 | |
| 2026-02-03 | NOTO ANTHONY J. | Director | 7,593 | $205,011 | |
| 2026-02-03 | THIEL JOHN W | Director | 7,593 | $205,011 | |
| 2026-02-03 | BYERWALTER MARIANN H | Director | 7,593 | $205,011 | |
| 2026-02-03 | YANG GEOFFREY Y | Director | 7,593 | $205,011 | |
| 2026-01-05 | JOHNSON JENNIFER M | Chief Executive Officer | 6,272 | · | |
| 2025-12-26 | JOHNSON CHARLES B | Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 25,440 | · | |
| 2025-12-17 | JOHNSON CHARLES B | Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 3,816 | · | |
| 2025-11-20 | JOHNSON CHARLES B | Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 50,000 | $1,060,000 | |
| 2025-11-18 | JOHNSON CHARLES B | Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 50,000 | $1,074,475 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-10-01 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-02 | Diana Harshbarger | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-02 | Diana Harshbarger | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-02 | Diana Harshbarger | Republican | buy | 50K–100K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $31.55 | -0.9% | · | $991 | -0.9% |
| 2 months | $24.91 | +25.6% | · | $1,256 | +25.6% |
| 3 months | $23.43 | +33.5% | $0.33 | $1,349 | +34.9% |
| 6 months | $22.82 | +37.1% | $0.66 | $1,400 | +40.0% |
| 1 year | $20.68 | +51.3% | $1.30 | $1,575 | +57.5% |
| 2 years | $20.33 | +53.8% | $2.56 | $1,664 | +66.4% |
| 3 years | $22.41 | +39.5% | $3.78 | $1,564 | +56.4% |
| 5 years | $27.19 | +15.0% | $6.10 | $1,374 | +37.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever BEN does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.