Framework Journal · one stock, one dated entry

Recorded 2026-07-29 · Permanent

Carlyle Group Inc logoCarlyle Group Inc CG

Outside both standards

An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.

In plain words · The Carlyle Group Inc.

The label
Markup

read at $46.47

Carlyle Group Inc holds its Markup at $46.47.

PHINPOOPSC
  • PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
  • INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
  • POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
  • OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
  • SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
  • edge confirmed
  • edge broken
  • edge forming

Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.

The investor read · the season, not the day

As held on the ledger · 2026-07-29
PhaseMarkup
Quantitative stateThe statistical read favours the sellers, held for 269 days
Price$46.47
Valuation31.83 trailing · 9.12 forward price to earnings
Values screenFAIL · score 30.0
Beta1.83

The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth

Read at
$46.47
31.83 P/E · 9.12 fwd
Our fair value
$66.21
43% discount
Analyst target (avg)
$56.00
+21% to current
Target low $44.00Analyst target rangeTarget high $70.00
▲ current $46.47 · | average target

Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going

$73.4$48.7$24.0TODAY5y agoPROJECTIONAnalyst high$70.00 +58%Our fair value$66.21 +50%Conservative$57.32 +29%Analyst avg$56.00 +26%

The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street

Current
$46.47
you are here
Conservative
$57.32
+23%
Analyst avg
$56.00
+21%
Our fair value
$66.21
+42%
Analyst high
$70.00
+51%

Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.

Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.

Revenue growth-94.10%
Profit margin16.82%
Debt to equity198.21
Analyst consensusBuy · 17 covering

Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.

The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English

This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:

The common standard · AAOIFI
Used by most halal investing apps
✗ DOES NOT PASS
Our stricter standard · asset-based
The one Titan applies
✗ DOES NOT PASS

Why it fails. The problem is its excluded industry: asset management. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.

What these two standards are, and how they differ →

  • Business activity Excluded industry: Asset Management Fail
  • Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
  • Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
  • Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
  • Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail

Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.

The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean

Private Equity Giant Fails Core Ethics Test

Money from pensions and sovereign funds flows through Carlyle into buyouts and credit plays across the globe. The firm looks cheap on a 9.1 times forward multiple with a 17 percent profit margin, yet revenue has collapsed 94 percent and the business sits in an excluded industry.

We pass outright. Asset management is on the banned list, so the 44 percent gap to our fair value and the buy-rated analyst targets do not matter. The narrow moat and 9 percent ROE simply reinforce the decision.

Cyclical fee income and carried-interest swings can turn fast when markets wobble, and currency or deal-flow shocks hit emerging exposures hard. Low multiples on distressed earnings have trapped investors before. Analysis, not advice.

The fundamentals · plain-English read
Forward P/E9.1x
very cheap relative to earnings
Trailing P/E31.8x
a premium valuation
Revenue growth-94.1%
revenue is shrinking
Profit margin16.8%
healthy profit margins
Return on equity9.4%
a modest return on shareholder capital
Debt to equity1.98
a meaningful debt load worth watching
Current ratio1.99
healthy short-term liquidity
Beta1.83
much more volatile than the market
Market cap$16.7B
Employees2,500

The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.

Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.

Related securities · others in CG's space worth a look

Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.

The trader read · the latest dated commentary

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 3%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $60. Entered 2026-07-24 · Markdown

The dated journal · newest first, never edited

2026-07-24 Markdown $46.07 +0.7% Entry 4

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 3%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $60.

2026-07-18 Markdown $45.75 +0.0% Entry 3

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 3%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $60.

2026-07-03 Markdown $45.75 +0.0% Entry 2

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.

2026-07-02 Markdown $45.75 Entry 1

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.

Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.

The political ledger · congressional disclosures

Disclosures naming CG
DatePoliticianPartyTypeAmount
9 Apr2026 Josh Gottheimer Democrat sell 15K–50K
6 May2026 Jared Moskowitz Democrat buy 1K–15K
5 Jun2026 David Taylor Republican buy 1K–15K
27 May2026 Dave McCormick Republican buy 100K–250K
27 May2026 Jerry Moran Republican sell 1K–15K

What holding actually paid · price plus dividends

If $1,000 had been placed · historical, not a promise
PeriodPrice thenPrice returnDivs per share$1,000 becameTotal return
1 month $49.10 -9.8% $0.35 $909 -9.1%
2 months $46.95 -5.7% $0.35 $950 -5.0%
3 months $44.98 -1.6% $0.35 $992 -0.8%
6 months $59.36 -25.4% $0.70 $758 -24.2%
1 year $45.62 -3.0% $1.40 $1,001 +0.1%
2 years $38.50 +15.0% $2.80 $1,222 +22.2%
3 years $27.36 +61.8% $4.20 $1,771 +77.1%
5 years $37.68 +17.5% $6.60 $1,350 +35.0%

Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever CG does next, these words stay.

Carlyle Group Inc · CG · Markup · $46.47
Recorded 2026-07-29 · before the outcome · scored mechanically

Get our weekly market brief free.