The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 4%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (10 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $100.
Omnicom Group OMC
Clears the common standardAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Omnicom Group Inc., together with its subsidiaries, offers advertising, marketing, and corporate communications services.
read at $81.73
Omnicom Group holds its Markup at $81.73.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 46 days |
| Price | $81.73 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 6.67 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 81.3 |
| Beta | 0.66 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads OPPORTUNITY — it trades at roughly a 54% discount to our $125.62 fair value, weak competitive moat, 69.20% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 69.20% |
| Profit margin | 0.32% |
| Debt to equity | 110.57 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 12 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 19.7% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Against market value it is 49.4%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.1% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 39.1% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.6% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Ad budgets still flow through every cycle
Think of advertising as the oxygen brands keep buying even when times tighten. Omnicom sits at the centre of that spend, yet the shares trade at just 6.7 times forward earnings with a 54 percent gap to our fair value of 125.62. Revenue jumped 69 percent while the ethical screen cleared without issue and twelve analysts still cluster around a 100 target.
The low multiple reflects a business that keeps delivering reach across media, precision marketing and healthcare communications. A margin of safety this wide on a name that passes our screens is rare in communication services right now.
Yet profit margins sit at zero and return on equity is only 2 percent, with a weak moat leaving it exposed to client cuts the moment budgets tighten. Advertising is a classic cyclical business, so the cheap earnings multiple may simply mark peak-cycle numbers rather than a bargain. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 6.7x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Revenue growth | 69.2% growing very fast |
| Profit margin | 0.3% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 2.0% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.11 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.91 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.66 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $23.3B |
| Employees | 120,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on OMC
- › Omnicom Group (OMC) Could Be 27% Undervalued As Interpublic Deal Story Builds Simply Wall St. · 14d ago
- › Interbrand Adds Morris, Kearney To Strengthen North American Connections MediaPost · 15d ago
- › 2 Cash-Producing Stocks to Keep an Eye On and 1 We Find Risky StockStory · 15d ago
- › 1 Value Stock with Exciting Potential and 2 That Underwhelm StockStory · 16d ago
- › VZ, T, TMUS: SpaceX Starlink’s Rise Tests Telecom Giants, But This Analyst Sees Opportunity Ahead Stocktwits · 19d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in OMC's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
OMC trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-01 | MARTORE GRACIA C | Director | 680 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | WYATT E LEE JR | Director | 681 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | COLEMAN LEONARD S JR. | Director | 680 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | RICE LINDA JOHNSON | Director | 681 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | GERSTEIN MARK D. | Director | 979 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | SANTOS CASSANDRA | Director | 680 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | MOORE PATRICK Q | Director | 681 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | KISSIRE DEBORAH J | Director | 680 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | CHOKSI MARY C | Director | 680 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | WILLIAMS VALERIE M | Director | 680 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 May2026 | Mike Kelly | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 16 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 15 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 15K–50K |
| 1 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $75.15 | -1.5% | · | $985 | -1.5% |
| 2 months | $74.77 | -1.0% | · | $990 | -1.0% |
| 3 months | $77.91 | -5.0% | · | $950 | -5.0% |
| 6 months | $78.50 | -5.7% | $1.60 | $964 | -3.6% |
| 1 year | $71.14 | +4.1% | $3.00 | $1,083 | +8.3% |
| 2 years | $84.59 | -12.5% | $5.80 | $944 | -5.6% |
| 3 years | $85.99 | -13.9% | $7.90 | $953 | -4.7% |
| 5 years | $70.90 | +4.4% | $13.50 | $1,235 | +23.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.