The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 20.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 73%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (31 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26.
Trade Desk (The)
TTD · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $6.6B · 3,843 employees
The Trade Desk, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-10
Screened 2026-09-10 · the tape above runs as of 05:00 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its accumulation label.
Trade Desk (The) holds its Accumulation at $13.97. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 84 days.
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 84 days |
| Price at the screen | $13.97 |
| Valuation | 16.63 trailing · 13.89 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.01 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Accounts receivable
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 7.09% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is just 7.1% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling: it does not run on borrowed money. | Pass |
| Interest-bearing cash | 10.48% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 10.5% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 71.97% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 72.0% of assets, above the 49% limit. | Fail |
| Revenue purity | 2.37% | Below 5% | Only 2.4% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 21% discount to our $16.88 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 3.00% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-10 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 20.8% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 30 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits −3% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our model sees value the Street hasn't fully caught up to yet.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-10 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsAd tech looks cheap until the ethics check arrives
Picture a platform routing digital campaigns for brands across every screen and format, yet the books show persistent problems with accounts receivable. Trade Desk clears most financial hurdles with a forward multiple of 8.7 times, 12 percent revenue growth and a 15 percent profit margin, yet the ethical screen flags it outright. We pass for that single reason alone.
The business carries a moderate moat and returns 17 percent on equity, while thirty analysts sit on a hold rating with a 24 dollar median target. Those figures suggest room above the current 18.59 price, and our own fair value sits higher still. None of it overrides the accounts receivable failure that places the name outside our criteria.
Ad budgets remain tied to economic cycles, so any slowdown in spend would pressure both growth and collections further. The ethical lapse adds a layer of ongoing governance risk that standard multiples do not capture. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.9xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 16.6xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 0.84 |
| EPS, forward | 1.01 |
| Revenue growth | +3.0%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 13.6%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 15.4%a solid return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 8.88% |
| Debt to equity | 0.17minimal debt: a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 1.72healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 1.01moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.23% |
| 52-week range | 12.83 - 56.39 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $6.6B |
| Employees | 3,843 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeTTD trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 11.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 73%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (31 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 73%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (31 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $26.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-04 | TAWAKOL OMAR | Director | 12,220 | · | |
| 2026-05-04 | CUNNINGHAM ANDREA LEE | Director | 7,899 | $42,453 | |
| 2026-05-04 | VOLLERO ANDREW | Director | 12,220 | · | |
| 2026-04-02 | CUNNINGHAM ANDREA LEE | Director | 48 | $1,231 | |
| 2026-04-02 | VOLLERO ANDREW | Director | 12,304 | · | |
| 2026-03-05 | FALBERG KATHRYN E. | Director | 152,828 | $4,655,113 | |
| 2026-03-04 | GREEN JEFFREY TERRY | Chief Executive Officer | 6,000,000 | $148,101,266 | |
| 2026-03-03 | GRANT JAY R | Officer | 167,197 | · | |
| 2026-03-03 | KUNDRA VIVEK | Chief Operating Officer | 167,197 | · | |
| 2026-03-03 | GREEN JEFFREY TERRY | Chief Executive Officer | 398,089 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun2026 | Tony Wied | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 20 Jul2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 18 Aug2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 18 Aug2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $21.52 | -10.4% | · | $896 | -10.4% |
| 2 months | $20.09 | -4.0% | · | $960 | -4.0% |
| 3 months | $26.52 | -27.3% | · | $727 | -27.3% |
| 6 months | $37.02 | -47.9% | · | $521 | -47.9% |
| 1 year | $72.37 | -73.4% | · | $267 | -73.4% |
| 2 years | $92.65 | -79.2% | · | $208 | -79.2% |
| 3 years | $74.58 | -74.1% | · | $259 | -74.1% |
| 5 years | $59.98 | -67.8% | · | $322 | -67.8% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever TTD does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.