The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 22% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 45%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $377.
Marriott International MAR
Clears the common standardAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Marriott International, Inc.
read at $374.43
Marriott International holds its Accumulation at $374.43.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Accumulation label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 3 days |
| Price | $374.43 |
| Valuation | 39.21 trailing · 28.56 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.11 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $341.48 fair value estimate, 12.60% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 12.60% |
| Profit margin | 35.97% |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 24 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 62.0% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Against market value it is 17.6%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 1.1% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 11.9% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.2% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Luxury hotels mask heavy debt burden
Picture a packed hotel lobby where every room books out, yet the owner still owes the bank more than the building is worth. Marriott shows solid revenue growth of 13 percent and a 36 percent profit margin, yet the shares trade above our fair value at a forward multiple of 28 times. That combination, plus the ethical screen failure on debt levels, is why we pass.
The business operates across every major region and carries a buy rating from most analysts, yet the price leaves little margin for the cycles that hit lodging hardest. High debt ratios amplify any slowdown in travel or rise in interest costs.
Lodging remains cyclical by nature, so peak margins and stretched valuations often signal caution rather than opportunity. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 28.6x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 39.2x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 12.6% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 36.0% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Current ratio | 0.46 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 1.11 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $98.7B |
| Employees | 414,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on MAR
- › Lodging Sector Set For Second-Quarter Beats Amid US RevPAR Acceleration, Morgan Stanley Says MT Newswires · 10d ago
- › What You Need To Know Ahead of Host Hotels & Resorts’ Earnings Release Barchart · 10d ago
- › Marriott International Earnings Preview: What to Expect Barchart · 12d ago
- › Marriott vs. Viking: Why the Better Quarter Doesn't Mean the Better Decade MarketBeat · 12d ago
- › Jim Cramer Believes Marriott Vacations “Is a Long-Term Winner” But Prefers Marriott Hotels Insider Monkey · 14d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in MAR's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
MAR trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-18 | ROE PEGGY FANG | Officer | 3,000 | $1,084,680 | |
| 2026-05-13 | MAO YIBING | Officer | 4,816 | $1,674,620 | |
| 2026-05-11 | HARRISON DEBORAH MARRIOTT | Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 670 | · | |
| 2026-05-11 | HENDERSON FREDERICK A | Director | 670 | · | |
| 2026-05-11 | LEWIS AYLWIN B | Director | 670 | · | |
| 2026-05-11 | SCHWAB SUSAN C | Director | 670 | · | |
| 2026-05-11 | ROZANSKI HORACIO | Director | 670 | · | |
| 2026-05-11 | HOBART LAUREN R | Director | 670 | · | |
| 2026-05-11 | HILL DAVID SHAWN | Officer | 174 | $61,046 | |
| 2026-05-11 | MCCARTHY MARGARET M | Director | 670 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 7 Feb2025 | Tim Walberg | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 27 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 27 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $352.62 | +9.5% | $0.73 | $1,097 | +9.7% |
| 2 months | $353.40 | +9.3% | $0.73 | $1,095 | +9.5% |
| 3 months | $315.69 | +22.3% | $0.73 | $1,225 | +22.5% |
| 6 months | $295.31 | +30.8% | $1.40 | $1,312 | +31.2% |
| 1 year | $265.69 | +45.3% | $2.74 | $1,464 | +46.4% |
| 2 years | $228.45 | +69.0% | $5.30 | $1,713 | +71.3% |
| 3 years | $173.97 | +122.0% | $7.49 | $2,263 | +126.3% |
| 5 years | $137.83 | +180.1% | $9.41 | $2,870 | +187.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.