The framework has shifted from distribution to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 1.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 53%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (27 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $21.
Li Auto Inc.
LI · Nasdaq · USD · Market cap $11.6B
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-09
Screened 2026-09-09 · the tape above runs as of 22:12 UTC · 11 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its markdown label.
Li Auto Inc. holds its Markdown at $11.91. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 3 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 3 days |
| Price at the screen | $11.91 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 14.65 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL |
| Beta | 0.54 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 110.07% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 110.1% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 624.18% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing cash and securities are 624.2% of assets, above the one-third limit. | Fail |
| Receivables | 0.00% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-09 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 5.7% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 25 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +27% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-09 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsElectric cars cannot fix shrinking sales
Li Auto makes electric SUVs that many drivers want yet the business is sliding backwards. Revenue fell 11 percent last year while margins and return on equity both sit at minus 2 percent. A forward multiple of 12 times looks tempting for a cyclical name but low earnings multiples at the top of the cycle usually signal trouble ahead not a bargain.
We pass because the moat is weak and the ethical screen flags excessive debt. Analyst targets sit near 18 dollars yet those forecasts ignore how quickly demand can vanish when subsidies fade or rivals cut prices. The thin margin of safety above the current price offers little protection once the cycle turns.
Cyclical businesses trading at depressed multiples often prove to be value traps rather than opportunities. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 14.7xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | -0.68 |
| EPS, forward | 0.81 |
| Revenue growth | -15.1%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | -4.4%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -6.6%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | -83.75% |
| Debt to equity | 0.22minimal debt: a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 1.81healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 0.54steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.06% |
| 52-week range | 11.65 - 27.10 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $11.6B |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeLI trades on Nasdaq. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 7.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 53%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (27 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $21.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 53%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (27 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $21.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Apr2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | buy | 250K–500K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
| 8 Mar2024 | Tommy Tuberville | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 8 Mar2024 | Tommy Tuberville | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $18.87 | -27.2% | · | $728 | -27.2% |
| 2 months | $19.21 | -28.5% | · | $715 | -28.5% |
| 3 months | $17.83 | -23.0% | · | $770 | -23.0% |
| 6 months | $17.01 | -19.3% | · | $807 | -19.3% |
| 1 year | $29.08 | -52.8% | · | $472 | -52.8% |
| 2 years | $19.46 | -29.5% | · | $706 | -29.5% |
| 3 years | $31.78 | -56.8% | · | $432 | -56.8% |
| 5 years | $28.11 | -51.2% | · | $488 | -51.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever LI does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.