The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 30%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $30. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The Gap, Inc.
GAP · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $7.3B
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-10
Screened 2026-09-10 · the tape above runs as of 22:12 UTC · 11 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its markup label.
The Gap, Inc. holds its Markup at $20.91. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 38 days.
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 38 days |
| Price at the screen | $20.91 |
| Valuation | 6.30 trailing · 7.94 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL |
| Beta | 2.06 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 63.86% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 63.9% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 34.17% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing cash and securities are 34.2% of assets, above the one-third limit. | Fail |
| Receivables | 0.00% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-10 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 21.2% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 19 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +29% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-10 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsCheap multiples on Gap hide a debt problem
Walk past any Gap store on a busy high street and you see racks of familiar denim and logos that still pull in steady traffic. Revenue edges up just 1 percent while the business clears a 6 percent profit margin and delivers 28 percent ROE, numbers that make the 7.8 times forward earnings look tempting next to the $20.35 share price and the $26.83 fair value.
We pass. The ethical screen flags the debt ratio first, and the cyclical label adds a second clear warning. Low multiples on consumer-facing names often reflect peak-cycle earnings rather than a bargain, especially when revenue barely moves and the moat sits only at moderate.
Eighteen analysts still lean buy with a $26 median target, yet the combination of leverage concerns and cycle exposure keeps the risk squarely on the balance sheet. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 7.9xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| Trailing P/E | 6.3xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| EPS, trailing | 3.32 |
| EPS, forward | 2.63 |
| Revenue growth | -2.0%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 8.1%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 33.8%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 3.35% |
| Dividend yield | 291.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.45a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.82healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 2.06much more volatile than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.16% |
| 52-week range | 18.11 - 29.36 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $7.3B |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeGAP trades on the NYSE. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 30%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $30. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 30%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $30. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 30%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $30. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from distribution to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 0.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 30%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $30. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 5.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 30%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $30.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 30%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $30.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug2026 | Kevin Hern | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $21.74 | -2.8% | · | $972 | -2.8% |
| 2 months | $26.30 | -19.6% | · | $804 | -19.6% |
| 3 months | $22.97 | -8.0% | $0.18 | $928 | -7.2% |
| 6 months | $26.39 | -19.9% | $0.34 | $814 | -18.6% |
| 1 year | $21.59 | -2.1% | $0.67 | $1,010 | +1.0% |
| 2 years | $24.61 | -14.1% | $1.29 | $911 | -8.9% |
| 3 years | $8.67 | +143.7% | $1.89 | $2,654 | +165.4% |
| 5 years | $26.67 | -20.8% | $3.00 | $905 | -9.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever GAP does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.