The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $95.
Estée Lauder Companies (The) EL
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
read at $82.13
Estée Lauder Companies (The) holds its Markup at $82.13.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 24 days |
| Price | $82.13 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 25.83 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.26 |
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
Does not pass. Debt ratio
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 47.6% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 22.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.8% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards — business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance.
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $62.83 fair value estimate, weak competitive moat, 4.60% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 4.60% |
| Profit margin | -1.67% |
| Debt to equity | 232.91 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 26 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Luxury creams lose their shine on weak numbers
Walk down any high street and Estée Lauder products still sit on the shelves, yet the company is posting a negative profit margin and a negative return on equity. We pass because the shares trade at 25.8 times forward earnings while our fair value sits well below the current price and the business carries too much debt.
Revenue growth has slowed to just 5 percent and the moat looks weak, leaving little room for error if consumers trade down. The ethical screen flags the debt ratio as a clear fail, and that alone rules it out regardless of what the sell side says.
Analysts may still favour the name with a median target near 90 dollars, but peak margins and stretched valuations have trapped investors in similar consumer names before. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 25.8x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Revenue growth | 4.6% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | -1.7% currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -5.9% not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 2.33 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.27 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.26 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $29.7B |
| Employees | 40,470 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on EL
- › 3 Profitable Stocks We Think Twice About StockStory · 3d ago
- › 2 Stocks Down 44% and 30% to Buy Right Now and Hold for the Next Decade Motley Fool · 4d ago
- › J. Crew names brand president Retail Dive · 10d ago
- › Estée Lauder’s Profit Recovery Plan and Russell Inclusion Might Change The Case For Investing In EL Simply Wall St. · 11d ago
- › Estée Lauder (EL) Stock May Trade At A Discount As Restructuring Builds Simply Wall St. · 11d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in EL's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
EL trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-27 | DE LA FAVERIE STEPHANE | Chief Executive Officer | 5,787 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | SHRIVASTAVA AKHIL | Chief Financial Officer | 5,265 | · | |
| 2025-11-26 | LAUDER JANE A | Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 17,840 | $1,596,145 | |
| 2025-11-26 | LA LANDE RASHIDA K | General Counsel | 1,604 | $151,498 | |
| 2025-11-26 | LAUDER JANE A | Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 17,840 | $1,683,739 | |
| 2025-11-18 | WEBSTER MERIDITH P | Officer | 5,430 | $476,971 | |
| 2025-11-11 | STERNLICHT BARRY S | Director | 3,972 | $335,038 | |
| 2025-11-11 | STERNLICHT BARRY S | Director | 3,972 | $364,749 | |
| 2025-11-06 | LAL 2015 ELF TRUST | Trustee | 5,670,000 | $508,599,000 | |
| 2025-11-06 | EVELYN H. LAUDER 2012 MARITAL TRUST TWO | Trustee | 2,845,283 | $255,221,885 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | sell | 500K–1M |
| 8 May2026 | Dave McCormick | Republican | buy | 500K–1M |
| 8 Apr2026 | Richard Blumenthal | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 8 Apr2026 | Richard Blumenthal | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $82.43 | +3.4% | $0.35 | $1,038 | +3.8% |
| 2 months | $72.39 | +17.8% | $0.35 | $1,182 | +18.2% |
| 3 months | $83.97 | +1.5% | $0.35 | $1,019 | +1.9% |
| 6 months | $104.82 | -18.7% | $0.70 | $820 | -18.0% |
| 1 year | $69.44 | +22.8% | $1.40 | $1,248 | +24.8% |
| 2 years | $114.55 | -25.6% | $3.11 | $771 | -22.9% |
| 3 years | $166.94 | -48.9% | $5.75 | $545 | -45.5% |
| 5 years | $278.47 | -69.4% | $10.66 | $344 | -65.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.