The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 7%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $67.
Unilever plc ADR UL
Clears both ethical standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Unilever PLC operates as a fast-moving consumer goods company in the Asia Pacific, Africa, the Americas, and Europe.
read at $60.94
Unilever plc ADR holds its Markup at $60.94.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 121 days |
| Price | $60.94 |
| Valuation | 20.59 trailing · 15.66 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.45 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Profit margin | 18.75% |
| Debt to equity | 160.79 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 4 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company clears both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Everyday Soap and Tea Keep Unilever Steady
Unilever sells shampoo, spreads and washing powder to households from Lagos to Liverpool. The numbers look solid, with 31% ROE, 19% profit margins and a forward multiple of 16 times, plus a clean ethical pass and a 16% gap between the share price and our fair value.
Yet the opportunity rating sits at none. The narrow moat and defensive consumer setting deliver reliable cash, but the business shows no edge that would make it stand out from similar compounders.
Currency moves in emerging markets and slow volume growth remain real drags, even with the apparent buffer. The modest analyst target of 69 dollars underlines the lack of excitement. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 15.7x reasonably valued |
| Trailing P/E | 20.6x a premium valuation |
| Profit margin | 18.7% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 31.0% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.61 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.79 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.45 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $131.2B |
| Employees | 93,731 |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to United Kingdom and to currency swings; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on UL
- › Baker McKenzie leads consumer M&A law firms in H1 – data Just Drinks · 23h ago
- › Unilever moves towards staff agreement ahead of McCormick deal Just Food · 2d ago
- › Heatwave Boosts Ice Cream Sales as Magnum Beats Earnings Forecasts BeInCrypto · 2d ago
- › Unilever (LSE:ULVR) Lifts Outlook As McCormick Deal And World Cup Sponsorship Advance Simply Wall St. · 2d ago
- › European Stocks Close Mixed Wednesday; Oil Stocks Surge on Middle East Fighting MT Newswires · 3d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in UL's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 May2026 | Greg Stanton | Democrat | sell | 100K–250K |
| 21 Apr2026 | Susie Lee | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $56.70 | +3.4% | $0.55 | $1,044 | +4.4% |
| 2 months | $57.79 | +1.5% | $0.55 | $1,024 | +2.4% |
| 3 months | $63.79 | -8.1% | $0.55 | $928 | -7.2% |
| 6 months | $63.72 | -8.0% | $1.10 | $938 | -6.2% |
| 1 year | $68.69 | -14.6% | $2.28 | $887 | -11.3% |
| 2 years | $58.55 | +0.2% | $4.47 | $1,078 | +7.8% |
| 3 years | $50.65 | +15.8% | $6.54 | $1,287 | +28.7% |
| 5 years | $57.01 | +2.9% | $10.74 | $1,217 | +21.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.