The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 3.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 7%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $67.
Unilever plc ADR
UL · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $132.7B · 93,731 employees
Unilever PLC operates as a fast-moving consumer goods company in the Asia Pacific, Africa, the Americas, and Europe.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-10
Screened 2026-09-10 · the tape above runs as of 23:00 UTC · 20 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 61.63 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 76.77, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against today's price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Unilever plc ADR holds its Markdown at $61.63. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 121 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 121 days |
| Price at the screen | $61.63 |
| Valuation | 20.82 trailing · 15.59 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.45 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 39.16% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 39.2% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 3.67% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 3.7% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 12.48% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 12.5% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.79% | Below 5% | Only 0.8% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Conscience OverlayThe quantitative screen above is arithmetic. Separately, community boycott lists cite this company: Cited in consumer boycott campaigns post-October 2023 for maintaining consumer products operations and brand presence in Israel. The desk records that flag here without folding it into the verdict: the screen measures the balance sheet, the overlay informs the conscience, and they are different judgements that belong to different owners. The second one is yours.
The Fair Value Range
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-10 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 24.6% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 4 covering, consensus None. The average target sits +21% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-10 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsUnilever's Debt Woes Tarn its Household Shine
Imagine every corner store across the globe, and Unilever products are likely on the shelves - that's the reach of this household and personal products giant. Unilever operates across Beauty & Wellbeing, Personal Care, Home Care, and Foods segments, catering to everyday needs in Asia Pacific, Africa, the Americas, and Europe. Why it stands out is its broad product range and massive market penetration, but it lags on growth, showing zero revenue growth, a sign that the company might be facing market saturation or challenges in innovation.
Despite a robust profit margin of 18% and a commendable ROE of 32%, Unilever's debt ratio has it failing our ethical screen. This high debt load is a significant concern, especially in times of economic stress, as it could limit the company's flexibility and resilience. The market's forward P/E of 16.4x suggests reasonable valuation, but our fair value estimate of $77.12 offers an 18% margin of safety, indicating that while not overpriced, there's not a compelling reason to rush into this investment.
The risk here is twofold: a stagnant revenue growth rate that may signal a maturity or decline phase in its business cycles, and a debt ratio that fails our ethical screen. Together, these factors paint a picture of a company that, despite its global presence and brand strength, is currently not aligning with our ethical investment principles. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 15.6xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 20.8xa premium valuation |
| EPS, trailing | 2.96 |
| EPS, forward | 3.95 |
| Revenue growth | +0.5%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 18.3%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 31.9%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 5.07% |
| Dividend yield | 387.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.75a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.74below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.45barely tracks the market's swings |
| 52-week range | 54.75 - 74.98 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $132.7B |
| Employees | 93,731 |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to United Kingdom and to currency swings; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeUL trades on the NYSE (the company is based in United Kingdom). As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 8.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 7%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $67.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 7%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $67.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Here’s Why Aristotle International Equity Fund Exited Unilever (UL) Insider Monkey · 2d ago
- Update: Unilever Offers Shorter Worker Safeguards Outside Europe in McCormick Deal MT Newswires · 3d ago
- Unilever accused of “double standards” for workers post McCormick merger Just Food · 3d ago
- Unilever (LSE:ULVR) Could Be 10% Overvalued On Its Restructuring Story Simply Wall St. · 3d ago
- McCormick and Unilever’s $45B merger under investigation in UK Food Dive · 4d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-25 | April McClain Delaney | Democrat | sell | 100K–250K |
| 2026-08-25 | April McClain Delaney | Democrat | sell | 100K–250K |
| 2026-08-25 | April McClain Delaney | Democrat | sell | 100K–250K |
| 2026-08-24 | April McClain Delaney | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-24 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $56.70 | +3.4% | $0.55 | $1,044 | +4.4% |
| 2 months | $57.79 | +1.5% | $0.55 | $1,024 | +2.4% |
| 3 months | $63.79 | -8.1% | $0.55 | $928 | -7.2% |
| 6 months | $63.72 | -8.0% | $1.10 | $938 | -6.2% |
| 1 year | $68.69 | -14.6% | $2.28 | $887 | -11.3% |
| 2 years | $58.55 | +0.2% | $4.47 | $1,078 | +7.8% |
| 3 years | $50.65 | +15.8% | $6.54 | $1,287 | +28.7% |
| 5 years | $57.01 | +2.9% | $10.74 | $1,217 | +21.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever UL does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.