The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 5%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $164. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Procter & Gamble PG
Clears both ethical standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · The Procter & Gamble Company provides branded consumer packaged goods worldwide.
read at $147.41
Procter & Gamble holds its Markup at $147.41.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 3 days |
| Price | $147.41 |
| Valuation | 21.58 trailing · 20.90 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 84.7 |
| Beta | 0.38 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads OVERVALUED — it trades above our $127.98 fair value estimate, moderate competitive moat, 7.40% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 7.40% |
| Profit margin | 19.16% |
| Debt to equity | 67.65 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 23 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company clears both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 28.3% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 12.6% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.6% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Everyday Brands Trade Well Above Fair Value
Walk down any supermarket aisle and you will see P&G products in almost every basket. The company delivers a moderate moat, 7 percent revenue growth, 19 percent profit margins and 31 percent ROE, yet our fair value sits at 127.98 against the current price of 149.98. We therefore pass. The forward multiple of 21.3 times already prices in perfection.
Valuation risk is the clear issue. A 15 percent premium to fair value leaves little room for the modest growth on offer, and any slowdown in consumer spending or input cost pressure would compress margins quickly. Analyst targets at 163 ignore that the same quality is available at lower prices elsewhere.
The ethical screen is clear, with no red flags on labour or environmental grounds. Still, the numbers do not justify stepping in at these levels. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 20.9x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 21.6x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 7.4% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 19.2% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 31.1% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.68 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 0.73 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.38 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $343.3B |
| Employees | 109,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on PG
- › Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock Looks Cheap On Cash Flow But Pricey On Earnings Simply Wall St. · 16h ago
- › Week in review: The deepening K-shaped economy, stubbornly high rates Yahoo Finance Video · 21h ago
- › Why e.l.f. & Estée Lauder benefit from inflation Yahoo Finance Video · 2d ago
- › P&G Stock Falls 1.8% as $1 Billion Cost Hit Looms GuruFocus.com · 2d ago
- › Publicis Is Winning the AI Advertising Race, and Its Stock Still Looks Cheap Barrons.com · 2d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in PG's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
PG trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 5%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $164. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 5%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $164. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 1.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 5%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $164. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 5%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $164. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 5%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $164. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 2.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 5%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $164. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 5%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $164.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | MCEVOY ASHLEY | Director | 161 | · | |
| 2026-03-10 | PORTMAN ROBERT JONES | Director | 193 | · | |
| 2026-03-10 | PORTMAN ROBERT JONES | Director | 49 | · | |
| 2026-03-10 | KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J | Director | 201 | · | |
| 2026-03-10 | ARNOLD CRAIG | Director | 161 | · | |
| 2026-03-10 | JIMENEZ JOSEPH JR | Director | 273 | · | |
| 2026-03-10 | MCCARTHY CHRISTINE M. | Director | 209 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA | Officer | 5,549 | $917,199 | |
| 2026-02-19 | WHALEY SUSAN STREET | Officer | 1,809 | $288,454 | |
| 2026-02-13 | AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER | Officer | 15,169 | $1,381,441 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 7 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 20 Apr2026 | Jonathan Jackson | Democrat | buy | 15K–50K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $143.36 | +4.2% | · | $1,042 | +4.2% |
| 2 months | $144.08 | +3.7% | $1.09 | $1,044 | +4.4% |
| 3 months | $149.38 | 0.0% | $1.09 | $1,007 | +0.7% |
| 6 months | $138.72 | +7.7% | $2.15 | $1,092 | +9.2% |
| 1 year | $158.29 | -5.6% | $4.26 | $971 | -2.9% |
| 2 years | $158.79 | -5.9% | $8.34 | $993 | -0.7% |
| 3 years | $135.59 | +10.2% | $12.17 | $1,191 | +19.1% |
| 5 years | $118.74 | +25.8% | $19.37 | $1,421 | +42.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.