The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 7.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $649.
Deere & Company DE
Clears the common standard
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Deere & Company engages in the manufacture and distribution of various equipment worldwide.
read at $628.16
Deere & Company holds its Markup at $628.16.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 6 days |
| Price | $628.16 |
| Valuation | 35.63 trailing · 27.63 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.90 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $547.33 fair value estimate, moderate competitive moat.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
| Revenue growth | -11.10% |
| Profit margin | 10.10% |
| Debt to equity | 376.02 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 23 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 60.6% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Against market value it is 28.6%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.5% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 12.9% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Yellow tractors hide a heavy debt load
Farmers still need reliable kit to plant and harvest, yet Deere trades at a premium that ignores shrinking sales. The company posts a forward P/E of 26.2 times while revenue fell 11 percent, leaving little margin of safety at the current price above our fair value. We pass because the numbers simply do not add up.
Profit margins sit at 10 percent and return on equity reaches 18 percent, but a moderate moat cannot offset the ethical screen failure on debt levels. Twenty three analysts may still favour the shares with a $640 median target, yet our reading stays clear on valuation and leverage.
The real risk is cyclical earnings peaking just as multiples stay stretched and balance sheet pressure builds. Debt has already tripped the ethical test, and any downturn in farm spending would expose the gap between price and value quickly. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 27.6x a premium valuation |
| Trailing P/E | 35.6x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | -11.1% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 10.1% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 18.3% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 3.76 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 2.21 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.90 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $169.7B |
| Employees | 73,100 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on DE
- › ALG or DE: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now? Zacks · 2d ago
- › Deere (DE) Stock Declines While Market Improves: Some Information for Investors Zacks · 3d ago
- › Stock Market Today, July 29: Stocks Slide on Hawkish Fed and Increased Middle East Tensions Motley Fool · 4d ago
- › Deere (DE) Could Be 1% Undervalued On Its Precision Farming Narrative Simply Wall St. · 4d ago
- › Avery Dennison to Report Q2 Earnings: Here's What to Expect Zacks · 5d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in DE's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
DE trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $649.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | CARET LEANNE G | Director | 293 | · | |
| 2026-03-04 | ERWIN TAMI A | Director | 293 | · | |
| 2026-03-04 | STOCKTON DMITRI L | Director | 293 | · | |
| 2026-03-04 | FEIGHT ROBERT PRESTON | Director | 293 | · | |
| 2026-03-04 | PAGE GREGORY R | Director | 293 | · | |
| 2026-03-04 | SIKES JAMES BRIAN | Director | 293 | · | |
| 2026-03-04 | HUNN LAURENCE NEIL | Director | 293 | · | |
| 2026-03-04 | HEUBERGER ALAN CLETUS | Director | 293 | · | |
| 2026-03-04 | TALTON SHEILA G | Director | 293 | · | |
| 2026-01-14 | REED CORY J. | Officer | 12,000 | $6,120,000 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
| 8 May2026 | Kevin Hern | Republican | exchange | 15K–50K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $588.74 | -3.2% | · | $968 | -3.2% |
| 2 months | $605.00 | -5.8% | · | $942 | -5.8% |
| 3 months | $584.12 | -2.4% | $1.62 | $978 | -2.2% |
| 6 months | $472.92 | +20.5% | $3.24 | $1,212 | +21.2% |
| 1 year | $509.15 | +11.9% | $6.48 | $1,132 | +13.2% |
| 2 years | $358.22 | +59.1% | $12.66 | $1,626 | +62.6% |
| 3 years | $363.38 | +56.8% | $18.20 | $1,618 | +61.8% |
| 5 years | $319.84 | +78.2% | $26.96 | $1,866 | +86.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.