The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 8.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $136.
American Water Works AWK
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · American Water Works Company, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides water and wastewater services in the United States.
read at $134.56
American Water Works holds its Markup at $134.56.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 6 days |
| Price | $134.56 |
| Valuation | 23.86 trailing · 20.49 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.60 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $118.74 fair value estimate, moderate competitive moat, 5.70% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
| Revenue growth | 5.70% |
| Profit margin | 21.17% |
| Debt to equity | 142.33 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 11 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 44.9% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 1.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 1.8% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Turning on the tap still costs too much
Every morning millions of households expect clean water at the turn of a handle. American Water Works sits at the centre of that daily routine across dozens of US states. Yet the shares trade well above our fair value with a negative margin of safety, a forward multiple of 20.6 times earnings and only 6 percent revenue growth. That combination leaves little room for error.
The business prints a solid 21 percent profit margin and a 10 percent return on equity with a moderate moat. Eleven analysts call it a hold with a median target just above the current price. None of this changes the fact that the shares already price in steady regulated returns while leaving valuation and balance-sheet questions unaddressed.
Debt levels trip the ethical screen outright. In a sector where capital intensity is high and rates are capped, that leverage adds real fragility when interest costs rise or regulators push back. We pass. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 20.5x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 23.9x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 5.7% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 21.2% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 10.2% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.42 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.37 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.60 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $26.3B |
| Employees | 7,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on AWK
- › Can CWT's Infrastructure Investments Drive Long-Term Earnings Growth? Zacks · 15d ago
- › American Water (AWK) Stock Gets Fair Value Bump As Analysts Weigh Rate Cases And Merger Simply Wall St. · 17d ago
- › American Water Works (AWK) Stock Looks Overvalued On Dividends Yet Fair On Earnings Simply Wall St. · 17d ago
- › American Water Works Company (AWK) Expands Its Infrastructure Focus, Is The Stock Looking Expensive? Simply Wall St. · 17d ago
- › CWT vs. AWK: Which Stock Is the Better Value Option? Zacks · 19d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in AWK's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
AWK trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $136.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | EDWARDS JEFFREY N. | Director | 1,374 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | JOHNSON JULIA LOUISE | Director | 1,374 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | GROW LISA A | Director | 1,374 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | MCGUIGAN STUART M | Director | 1,374 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | KAMPLING PATRICIA L | Director | 1,374 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | KURZ KARL F | Director | 2,159 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | MARBERRY MICHAEL L | Director | 1,374 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | NATHOO RAFFIQ A | Director | 1,374 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | HAVANEC LAURIE P | Director | 1,374 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | WIKLE MELISSA K. | Officer | 1,672 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $125.12 | +1.4% | $0.90 | $1,021 | +2.1% |
| 2 months | $136.25 | -6.9% | $0.90 | $938 | -6.2% |
| 3 months | $137.27 | -7.6% | $0.90 | $931 | -6.9% |
| 6 months | $128.30 | -1.1% | $1.72 | $1,002 | +0.2% |
| 1 year | $137.65 | -7.8% | $3.38 | $946 | -5.4% |
| 2 years | $122.38 | +3.7% | $6.50 | $1,090 | +9.0% |
| 3 years | $136.55 | -7.1% | $9.39 | $998 | -0.2% |
| 5 years | $144.43 | -12.2% | $14.53 | $979 | -2.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.