The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 0.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $11.
Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. ARCO
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
read at $8.23
Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. holds its Distribution at $8.23.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 3 days |
| Price | $8.23 |
| Valuation | 7.41 trailing · 9.65 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL |
| Beta | 0.49 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 58% discount to our $13.01 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 12.90% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 12.90% |
| Profit margin | 4.86% |
| Debt to equity | 278.65 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 9 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 131.1% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 24.7% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Latin America's biggest McDonald's franchisee fails on debt
Picture a queue for burgers stretching from Sao Paulo to Mexico City. Arcos Dorados runs those outlets, yet its balance sheet already carries more leverage than our screens allow. The business posts 13% revenue growth and a 36% return on equity, yet profit margins sit at just 5% and the ethical screen flags the debt ratio immediately. That single failure rules the name out before any valuation debate begins.
We pass for two clear reasons. First, the debt breach sits outside our tolerance regardless of the 9.7 times forward earnings multiple or the 58% gap to our fair value. Second, consumer cyclical exposure means today's low multiple can simply mark peak earnings rather than a bargain. Analyst targets cluster near 12 dollars, but none of that offsets the ethical red line.
Risk sits around leverage in volatile currencies and thin margins that leave little room for shocks. The moat is only moderate and offers no protection once debt service costs rise. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.7x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 7.4x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Revenue growth | 12.9% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 4.9% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 36.3% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 2.79 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 0.80 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.49 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $1.7B |
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in ARCO's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
ARCO trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $11.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $11.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | STATON WOODS W. | Officer and Director | 58,207 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | TANNENBAUM MARIANO | Chief Financial Officer | 22,526 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | GONZALEZ AVILA CARLOS EDUARDO | Chief Operating Officer | 7,522 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | RAGANATO LUIS ALBERTO | Chief Executive Officer | 24,239 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | STATON FRANCISCO ALBERTO | Director | 13,033 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | CHU MICHAEL | Director | 4,988 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | FRANQUI ANNETTE V | Director | 4,988 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | FERNANDEZ JOSE RAUL | Director | 4,988 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | ALONSO SERGIO DANIEL | Director | 4,988 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | BERMAN MARTIN KARLA PAOLA | Director | 4,988 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $8.64 | -3.7% | · | $963 | -3.7% |
| 2 months | $8.50 | -2.1% | · | $979 | -2.1% |
| 3 months | $7.67 | +8.5% | $0.07 | $1,094 | +9.4% |
| 6 months | $7.29 | +14.1% | $0.13 | $1,159 | +15.9% |
| 1 year | $7.23 | +15.1% | $0.25 | $1,185 | +18.5% |
| 2 years | $8.59 | -3.1% | $0.49 | $1,026 | +2.6% |
| 3 years | $8.29 | +0.4% | $0.69 | $1,087 | +8.7% |
| 5 years | $5.72 | +45.4% | $0.89 | $1,610 | +61.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.