The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 30.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 57%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 37%. The street (4 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $14.
NovaGold Resources Inc.
NG · NYSE American · USD · Market cap $4.1B · 12 employees
NovaGold Resources Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-08-26
Screened 2026-08-26 · the tape above runs as of 23:26 UTC · 4 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its markup label.
NovaGold Resources Inc. holds its Markup at $9.32. Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 81 days.
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 81 days |
| Price at the screen | $9.32 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · -39.30 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 2.16 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 49.73% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 49.7% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 1.31% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 1.3% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 32.81% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 32.8% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | Excluded | Below 5% | of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-08-26 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 34.1% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 3 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +34% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-08-26 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsGold project burns cash with no profits in sight
Picture a developer sitting on one of North America's largest undeveloped gold deposits yet still posting zero profit margins and a negative 25 percent return on equity. NovaGold Resources shows a forward price to earnings ratio of negative 21.5 times and carries an unknown moat, so the numbers offer no reason to step in. The opportunity rating stays at none and the ethical screen returns insufficient data.
Gold mining sits squarely in a cyclical industry where low or negative multiples often mark peak earnings rather than bargains. Current losses and missing financial detail make any apparent discount look more like a warning than an opening. Analyst targets sit far above the current price but we ignore those calls when the underlying figures fail basic tests.
Currency swings, permitting delays and gold price swings add further layers of risk on top of the data gaps. We pass. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | -39.3x |
| EPS, trailing | -0.16 |
| EPS, forward | -0.24 |
| Profit margin | 0.0%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -24.6%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | -0.58% |
| Debt to equity | 0.41minimal debt: a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 112.82comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 2.16much more volatile than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.09% |
| 52-week range | 5.08 - 14.40 |
| Market cap | $4.1B |
| Employees | 12 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day; its business and earnings are exposed to Canada and to currency swings.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeNG trades on NYSE American (the company is based in Canada). As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 57%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 37%. The street (4 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $14.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun2026 | Tony Wied | Republican | sell | 15K–50K |
| 9 Jul2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 9 Jul2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 9 Jul2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $9.22 | -26.6% | · | $734 | -26.6% |
| 2 months | $9.48 | -28.6% | · | $714 | -28.6% |
| 3 months | $11.24 | -39.8% | · | $602 | -39.8% |
| 6 months | $9.70 | -30.2% | · | $698 | -30.2% |
| 1 year | $4.32 | +56.7% | · | $1,567 | +56.7% |
| 2 years | $3.71 | +82.5% | · | $1,825 | +82.5% |
| 3 years | $5.22 | +29.7% | · | $1,297 | +29.7% |
| 5 years | $9.72 | -30.4% | · | $697 | -30.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever NG does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.