The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 49%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 28%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $1084.
United Rentals URI
Clears the common standard
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · United Rentals, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates as an equipment rental company in the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand.
read at $1,127.91
United Rentals holds its Markup at $1,127.91.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 2 days |
| Price | $1,127.91 |
| Valuation | 27.15 trailing · 19.99 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.79 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 8% discount to our $1,214.18 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 11.80% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 11.80% |
| Profit margin | 15.67% |
| Debt to equity | 166.79 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 21 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 52.5% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Against market value it is 22.9%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 9.9% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Builders need the gear but debt blocks us
Picture a construction site where every digger and crane comes from one big rental yard. United Rentals dominates that flow across North America and beyond, posting 7% revenue growth, 15% profit margins and a solid 28% return on equity. Yet we pass. The shares trade at 19.3 times forward earnings with only modest headroom to our fair value, and the moderate moat does not offset the bigger red flag.
The ethical screen fails outright on the debt ratio, a structural issue that leaves the business exposed when rates stay high or cycles turn. Twenty-one analysts still lean buy with a median target above current levels, but none of that changes the leverage problem or the fact that peak-cycle earnings can flatter multiples that later compress.
This is exactly what the screen is for. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 20.0x priced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 27.1x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 11.8% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 15.7% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 28.9% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.67 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.76 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 1.79 much more volatile than the market |
| Market cap | $70.2B |
| Employees | 28,500 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on URI
- › United Rentals (URI) Stock Looks Above Fair Value On A 234% Run Simply Wall St. · 10d ago
- › Is United Rentals (URI) Undervalued After Raising Its 2026 Outlook? Simply Wall St. · 10d ago
- › How United Rentals’ Upgraded 2026 Guidance Tied to Project Demand Will Impact United Rentals (URI) Investors Simply Wall St. · 11d ago
- › United Rentals vs. Fluor: Which Infrastructure Stock Has Better Value? Zacks · 12d ago
- › United Rentals (URI) Rose on Robust Nonresidential Construction End Markets Insider Monkey · 12d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in URI's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
URI trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | HEUER BRANDT JULIE M | Director | 203 | $190,211 | |
| 2026-05-08 | TAUSSIG ALEXANDER R | Director | 203 | $190,211 | |
| 2026-05-08 | KELLY TERRI L | Director | 203 | $190,211 | |
| 2026-05-08 | JONES KIM HARRIS | Director | 203 | $190,211 | |
| 2026-05-08 | BRUNO MARC A | Director | 203 | $190,211 | |
| 2026-05-08 | LOPEZ-BALBOA FRANCISCO J | Director | 203 | $190,211 | |
| 2026-05-08 | SINGH SHIV | Director | 203 | $190,211 | |
| 2026-05-08 | MARTORE GRACIA C | Director | 203 | $190,211 | |
| 2026-05-08 | DE SHON LARRY D | Director | 203 | $190,211 | |
| 2026-04-27 | PINTOFF CRAIG ADAM | Officer | 2,466 | $2,374,758 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 May2026 | Rick Allen | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 8 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 27 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 13 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $936.22 | +12.8% | $1.97 | $1,130 | +13.0% |
| 2 months | $770.34 | +37.1% | $1.97 | $1,373 | +37.3% |
| 3 months | $732.31 | +44.2% | $1.97 | $1,445 | +44.5% |
| 6 months | $830.26 | +27.2% | $3.94 | $1,277 | +27.7% |
| 1 year | $709.78 | +48.8% | $7.52 | $1,498 | +49.8% |
| 2 years | $633.96 | +66.6% | $14.36 | $1,689 | +68.9% |
| 3 years | $378.01 | +179.4% | $20.58 | $2,848 | +184.8% |
| 5 years | $294.45 | +258.7% | $23.54 | $3,667 | +266.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.