The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
AT&T
T · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $161.0B · 132,590 employees
AT&T Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 15 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quoteLast reviewed 6 days ago
Screened 2026-10-15 · the tape above runs as of 13:28 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price23.50 USD at the 15 Oct 2026 close
- Our ratingAvoid, current read distribution
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans slightly to calls (put/call 0.86)
- Last reviewed15 Oct 2026 (6 days ago)
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
What this means: price 23.50 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 26.85, over the last year.
- Trend Distribution
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning political buying, disclosed 2026-10-09
- Options put/call open interest 0.86, read 2026-10-20
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its distribution label.
AT&T holds its Distribution at $23.50. The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 3 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 3 days |
| Price at the screen | $23.50 |
| Valuation | 7.68 trailing · 9.14 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.44 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 36.90% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 36.9% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.26% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.3% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 6.44% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 6.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
AT&T's business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 37% of the company, just over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-10-20. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
The Conscience OverlayThe quantitative screen above is arithmetic. Separately, community boycott lists cite this company: Documented on AFSC Investigate. The desk records that flag here without folding it into the verdict: the screen measures the balance sheet, the overlay informs the conscience, and they are different judgements that belong to different owners. The second one is yours.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 14% discount to our $26.85 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 2.30% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-10-15 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 14.3% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 23 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +23% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-10-15 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsTelecom Titan Buckling Under Heavy Debt
Imagine every call, every text, every byte of data that zips through the digital ether above your head - much of it is funneled through AT&T's network. It’s a company that serves as the backbone of modern communication. But here's the catch, for a company that's supposed to be as solid as a telecommunications tower, it’s staggering under a mountain of debt, which is why our ethical screen has failed it.
The numbers here are intriguing on the surface; a forward P/E of 9.8x suggests a value play, and a modest revenue growth of 2% paired with a healthy profit margin of 17% and ROE of 18% might look appealing. Yet, the moat is only moderate, and the consensus buy rating from the analysts targets a higher price. But the ethical failure, stemming from an alarming debt ratio, casts a long shadow over these financials.
Why we pass. AT&T may have been a telecommunications titan, but the risk sits heavily in its debt-laden balance sheet. The market is pricing it with a discount, yet the ethical concerns are significant. This isn’t a case of peak earnings masking a cyclical value trap; it’s a fundamental issue with financial stability that could shake investor confidence. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.1xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 7.7xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| EPS, trailing | 3.06 |
| EPS, forward | 2.57 |
| Revenue growth | +2.3%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 16.9%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 18.3%a solid return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 6.30% |
| Dividend yield | 441.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.29a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.97below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.44barely tracks the market's swings |
| Short interest, float | 0.02% |
| 52-week range | 19.89 - 29.44 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $161.0B |
| Employees | 132,590 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeT trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 4% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 4% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 6.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 4% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from markdown to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 4% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 12.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 4% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 4% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 0.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 4% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- BDO Moves to Harwood District, Taking a 25K SF Floor Yahoo Finance · 20h ago
- Market Force Information® Study Reveals Widening CX Gap Between Legacy Wireless Carriers and Challenger Brands Yahoo Finance · 24h ago
- 8 ‘Safe’ Stocks That Are Much Riskier Than They Look Yahoo Finance · 1d ago
- 3 Market-Beating Stocks for Long-Term Investors Yahoo Finance · 1d ago
- AT&T Earnings: What To Look For From T Yahoo Finance · 1d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | STANKEY JOHN T | Chief Executive Officer | 816 | $21,347 | |
| 2026-04-30 | DESROCHES PASCAL | Chief Financial Officer | 2,866 | $74,905 | |
| 2026-04-30 | SABRINA SANDERS S | Officer | 144 | $3,781 | |
| 2026-04-30 | LEE LORI M | Officer | 304 | $7,969 | |
| 2026-04-30 | MCELFRESH JEFFERY S. | Chief Operating Officer | 2,236 | $58,436 | |
| 2026-03-31 | DESROCHES PASCAL | Chief Financial Officer | 121,297 | $3,516,417 | |
| 2026-03-31 | SABRINA SANDERS S | Officer | 1,588 | $46,049 | |
| 2026-03-31 | LEE LORI M | Officer | 193 | $5,616 | |
| 2026-03-31 | MCELFRESH JEFFERY S. | Chief Operating Officer | 13,018 | $377,400 | |
| 2026-03-10 | LEE LORI M | Officer | 2,094 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | David Taylor | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-10-09 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-10-09 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-10-09 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-10-08 | Rick Larsen | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $24.87 | -6.8% | · | $932 | -6.8% |
| 2 months | $26.46 | -12.4% | · | $876 | -12.4% |
| 3 months | $27.11 | -14.5% | $0.28 | $866 | -13.4% |
| 6 months | $23.77 | -2.4% | $0.56 | $999 | -0.1% |
| 1 year | $27.23 | -14.8% | $1.11 | $892 | -10.8% |
| 2 years | $16.27 | +42.6% | $2.22 | $1,563 | +56.3% |
| 3 years | $13.56 | +71.1% | $3.34 | $1,957 | +95.7% |
| 5 years | $16.20 | +43.1% | $6.29 | $1,819 | +81.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever T does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.