The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 10%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $90.
Public Service Enterprise Group PEG
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated, through its subsidiaries, operates in electric and gas utility, and nuclear generation businesses in the United States.
read at $79.21
Public Service Enterprise Group holds its Accumulation at $79.21.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Accumulation label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 4 days |
| Price | $79.21 |
| Valuation | 17.52 trailing · 16.92 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.53 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $79.11 fair value estimate, moderate competitive moat, 19.40% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as roughly fairly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 19.40% |
| Profit margin | 17.69% |
| Debt to equity | 141.01 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 19 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 42.0% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 6.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 3.5% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 1.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Utility Looks Steady Yet Fails Debt Test
Utilities are meant to feel like the lights staying on in a storm, steady and essential. Public Service Enterprise Group delivers that profile yet we pass because it fails the ethical screen on debt ratio and offers barely any margin of safety at current levels.
Revenue is growing 19 percent with an 18 percent profit margin and 13 percent ROE, while the forward multiple sits at 16.8 times. The moderate moat and consensus buy rating from nineteen analysts do not move the needle when the ethical flag is raised and fair value sits just one percent above the $78.64 share price.
High debt in a regulated business can turn stable earnings into a trap when rates rise or regulators push back. The modest valuation premium is not enough compensation for that structural concern. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 16.9x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 17.5x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 19.4% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 17.7% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 13.4% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.41 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.97 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.53 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $39.5B |
| Employees | 13,189 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on PEG
- › Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG) Stock May Be Fairly Valued Despite Storm Recovery Work Simply Wall St. · 11d ago
- › What to Expect From Public Service Enterprise’s Next Quarterly Earnings Report Barchart · 13d ago
- › Chief Investment Strategist: “We Are Spending Almost 3% of GDP on AI” as Stocks Tune Out Global Conflict on “Astronomical Investment” 24/7 Wall St. · 19d ago
- › Palantir, Chevron upgraded: Wall Street's top analyst calls The Fly · 27d ago
- › Vistra or Public Service Enterprise: Which Utility Stock Stands Out? Zacks · 30d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in PEG's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
PEG trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | DEESE WILLIE A | Director | 2,246 | $180,017 | |
| 2026-05-01 | STEPHENSON SCOTT G | Director | 2,246 | $180,017 | |
| 2026-05-01 | LAROSSA RALPH A JR. | Chief Executive Officer | 2,083 | $169,152 | |
| 2026-04-01 | LAROSSA RALPH A JR. | Chief Executive Officer | 2,083 | $169,231 | |
| 2026-03-09 | HANEMANN KIM C | Officer | 8 | $738 | |
| 2026-03-05 | LAROSSA RALPH A JR. | Chief Executive Officer | 2,083 | $174,256 | |
| 2026-03-03 | THIGPEN RICHARD T. | Officer | 4,700 | $390,100 | |
| 2026-02-24 | LAROSSA RALPH A JR. | Chief Executive Officer | 183,028 | $15,708,801 | |
| 2026-02-24 | CREGG DANIEL J. | Chief Financial Officer | 45,875 | $3,937,882 | |
| 2026-02-24 | HANEMANN KIM C | Officer | 33,249 | $2,854,235 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $77.01 | +1.9% | $0.67 | $1,028 | +2.8% |
| 2 months | $82.41 | -4.8% | $0.67 | $960 | -4.0% |
| 3 months | $81.76 | -4.0% | $0.67 | $968 | -3.2% |
| 6 months | $77.66 | +1.0% | $1.34 | $1,028 | +2.8% |
| 1 year | $76.89 | +2.1% | $2.60 | $1,054 | +5.4% |
| 2 years | $68.97 | +13.8% | $5.06 | $1,211 | +21.1% |
| 3 years | $56.23 | +39.6% | $7.40 | $1,527 | +52.7% |
| 5 years | $52.31 | +50.0% | $11.72 | $1,724 | +72.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.