The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 0.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 1% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 14%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $23.
PG&E Corporation PCG
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · PG&E Corporation, through its subsidiary, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, engages in the sale and delivery of electricity and natural gas to customers in northern and central California, the United States.
read at $17.20
PG&E Corporation holds its Distribution at $17.20.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 4 days |
| Price | $17.20 |
| Valuation | 12.37 trailing · 9.54 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.28 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 46% discount to our $25.02 fair value, narrow competitive moat, 0.10% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 0.10% |
| Profit margin | 11.83% |
| Debt to equity | 189.45 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 16 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 43.3% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 3.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 2.1% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 2.1% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
California utility stumbles on debt before value
PG&E keeps the lights on across northern and central California, yet its balance sheet carries more debt than our ethical screen will allow. The numbers show 15% revenue growth, 11% margins and a 9.6 times forward earnings multiple, but the debt ratio alone ends the conversation.
We pass for that reason. A narrow moat and 9% return on equity do not offset the leverage issue, even when the shares sit well below our own fair value estimate. Sixteen analysts may call it a buy with a 23 dollar median target, yet the ethical flag takes priority.
The real risk sits in that debt within a regulated business where cash flows can tighten quickly under political or weather pressure. Low multiples on utilities often signal exactly this kind of constraint rather than a bargain. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.5x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 12.4x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 0.1% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 11.8% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 9.3% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.89 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.22 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.28 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $37.9B |
| Employees | 29,010 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on PCG
- › PG&E (PCG) Earnings Expected to Grow: Should You Buy? Zacks · 16 Jul 2026
- › PG&E Says Power Shutoffs Required in California on Wildfire Risk Bloomberg · 15 Jul 2026
- › PG&E faces $22M penalty for Mosquito Fire under proposed agreement Utility Dive · 13 Jul 2026
- › Has Duke Energy (DUK) Outpaced Other Utilities Stocks This Year? Zacks · 10 Jul 2026
- › Is PG&E (PCG) Still Cheap Following Its Methane Milestone? Simply Wall St. · 9 Jul 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in PCG's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
PCG trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 1% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 14%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $23.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-28 | GLICKMAN JASON M. | Officer | 47,264 | $772,766 | |
| 2026-04-28 | POPPE PATRICIA K. | Chief Executive Officer | 31,250 | $512,188 | |
| 2026-03-17 | COOPER KERRY WHORTON | Director | 2,500 | $46,700 | |
| 2026-03-16 | BURKE CAROLYN JEANNE | Chief Financial Officer | 144,806 | · | |
| 2026-03-16 | PETERMAN CARLA J | Officer | 31,786 | $582,002 | |
| 2026-03-05 | SINGH SUMEET | Officer | 55,698 | $1,020,387 | |
| 2026-03-04 | POPPE PATRICIA K. | Chief Executive Officer | 236,465 | · | |
| 2026-03-03 | POPPE PATRICIA K. | Chief Executive Officer | 32,335 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | SIMON JOHN R | General Counsel | 5,151 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | SANTOS MARLENE | Divisional Officer | 40,817 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $16.21 | +2.8% | · | $1,028 | +2.8% |
| 2 months | $18.54 | -10.1% | · | $899 | -10.1% |
| 3 months | $18.02 | -7.5% | $0.05 | $928 | -7.2% |
| 6 months | $14.74 | +13.1% | $0.10 | $1,138 | +13.8% |
| 1 year | $14.65 | +13.8% | $0.15 | $1,148 | +14.8% |
| 2 years | $18.20 | -8.4% | $0.22 | $928 | -7.2% |
| 3 years | $16.64 | +0.2% | $0.24 | $1,016 | +1.6% |
| 5 years | $10.35 | +61.1% | $0.24 | $1,634 | +63.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.