The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 16%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 14%. The street (14 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $188.
Leidos
LDOS · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $13.4B · 50,000 employees
Leidos Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides services and solutions for government and commercial customers in the United States and internationally.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-07-19
Screened 2026-07-19 · the tape above runs as of 22:40 UTC · 24 Jul · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its distribution label.
Leidos holds its Distribution at $106.48. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 8 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 8 days |
| Price at the screen | $106.48 |
| Valuation | 9.75 trailing · 8.12 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.55 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Defence | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Conscience OverlayThe quantitative screen above is arithmetic. Separately, community boycott lists cite this company: Cited by AFSC divest list for providing defense IT services, intelligence analytics, and military technology solutions. The desk records that flag here without folding it into the verdict: the screen measures the balance sheet, the overlay informs the conscience, and they are different judgements that belong to different owners. The second one is yours.
The Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 78% discount to our $190.00 fair value, narrow competitive moat, 3.70% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-07-19 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 78.4% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 15 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +43% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-07-19 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsLeidos trips the ethical line despite the numbers
Leidos builds software and services that governments use for national security work most investors never examine. We pass because the business activity screen blocks it outright, regardless of the 78% gap between the 106 price and our 190 fair value.
Revenue edges forward at just 4% while margins sit at 8% and ROE reaches 31%. The forward multiple of 8.1 times looks modest and analysts cluster around a 152 target, yet none of that matters once the ethical screen is triggered.
The narrow moat and government contract exposure add their own uncertainty, but the screen is the decisive factor here. We stay away on principle.
Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 8.1xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 9.8xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| EPS, trailing | 10.92 |
| EPS, forward | 13.11 |
| Revenue growth | +3.7%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 8.2%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 30.6%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 8.92% |
| Dividend yield | 132.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.37a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.40adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.55steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.05% |
| 52-week range | 98.86 - 205.77 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $13.4B |
| Employees | 50,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeLDOS trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | FUBINI DAVID G | Director | 1,067 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | JONAS TINA W | Director | 1,067 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | MAY GARY STEPHEN | Director | 1,067 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | SHANAHAN PATRICK M | Director | 1,067 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | NORTON NANCY A | Director | 1,067 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | DAHLBERG GREGORY R. | Director | 1,067 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | GEER NOEL BROWN | Director | 1,067 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | SHAPARD ROBERT S | Director | 1,067 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | KRAEMER HARRY M. JANSEN JR. | Director | 1,067 | · | |
| 2026-05-07 | MAY GARY STEPHEN | Director | 3,345 | $250,942 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $127.68 | -4.7% | · | $953 | -4.7% |
| 2 months | $152.88 | -20.4% | · | $796 | -20.4% |
| 3 months | $173.38 | -29.8% | $0.43 | $705 | -29.5% |
| 6 months | $189.63 | -35.8% | $0.86 | $646 | -35.4% |
| 1 year | $144.20 | -15.6% | $1.66 | $856 | -14.4% |
| 2 years | $141.81 | -14.2% | $3.22 | $881 | -11.9% |
| 3 years | $80.07 | +52.0% | $4.70 | $1,579 | +57.9% |
| 5 years | $100.25 | +21.4% | $7.56 | $1,290 | +29.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever LDOS does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.