The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 39%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $206.
Broadridge Financial Solutions BR
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
read at $163.41
Broadridge Financial Solutions holds its Markup at $163.41.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 1 days |
| Price | $163.41 |
| Valuation | 17.02 trailing · 14.16 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.89 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 34% discount to our $218.91 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 7.80% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 7.80% |
| Profit margin | 15.03% |
| Debt to equity | 120.88 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 8 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity: conventional financial services. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business involves an activity the values screen does not clear. Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 40.5% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 3.5% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 19.2% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.2% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Broadridge fails its ethics test on debt
Every proxy vote and fund statement still needs printing and delivery. Broadridge sits in the middle of that flow, posting steady eight percent revenue growth and a forty two percent return on equity. Yet the opportunity rating sits at avoid because the stock fails our ethical screen on its debt ratio, and that single red flag overrides the fourteen point four times forward earnings and moderate moat.
The eight analysts calling it a buy with a two hundred seven dollar median target ignore the leverage that sits on the balance sheet. At current prices the margin of safety looks attractive next to our one hundred eighty six dollar fair value, yet high debt turns what appears a defensive business into something more fragile when rates stay elevated.
Profit margins at fifteen percent show the operation runs well, but the ethical failure on debt is not negotiable. We pass. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 14.2x priced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 17.0x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 7.8% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 15.0% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 42.3% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.21 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.94 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.89 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $18.9B |
| Employees | 15,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in BR's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
BR trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 39%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (8 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $206.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-08 | MURRAY EILEEN K. | Director | 29 | · | |
| 2026-04-08 | KELLER BRETT A | Director | 80 | · | |
| 2026-04-08 | FLOWERS MELVIN L | Director | 16 | · | |
| 2026-04-08 | ZAVERY AMIT | Director | 51 | · | |
| 2026-04-08 | DUELKS ROBERT N | Director | 127 | · | |
| 2026-04-08 | MARKUS MAURA A | Director | 116 | · | |
| 2026-04-08 | NAZARETH ANNETTE L. | Director | 33 | · | |
| 2026-04-08 | MOSCONI PATRICIA ANN | Director | 2 | · | |
| 2026-04-07 | MURRAY EILEEN K. | Director | 384 | · | |
| 2026-04-07 | KELLER BRETT A | Director | 177 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 May2026 | Mike Kelly | Republican | sell | 15K–50K |
| 7 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 4 May2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 4 May2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 30 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $149.13 | -2.2% | · | $978 | -2.2% |
| 2 months | $151.12 | -3.5% | · | $965 | -3.5% |
| 3 months | $176.42 | -17.4% | $0.98 | $832 | -16.8% |
| 6 months | $229.26 | -36.4% | $1.95 | $645 | -35.5% |
| 1 year | $238.85 | -39.0% | $3.81 | $626 | -37.4% |
| 2 years | $190.43 | -23.4% | $7.25 | $804 | -19.6% |
| 3 years | $146.32 | -0.3% | $10.37 | $1,067 | +6.7% |
| 5 years | $149.52 | -2.5% | $15.68 | $1,080 | +8.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.