An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
VERDICT
The label
Markup
read at $44.93
Fidelity National Information Services holds its Markup at $44.93.
PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
edge confirmed
edge broken
edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
INVESTOR
The investor read · the season, not the day
As held on the ledger · 2026-07-29
Phase
Markup
Quantitative state
Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 33 days
Price
$44.93
Valuation
8.37 trailing · 6.56 forward price to earnings
Values screen
FAIL· score 10.0
Beta
0.81
OPPORTUNITY
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 53% discount to our $68.75 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 30.10% revenue growth.
Read at
$44.93
8.37 P/E · 6.56 fwd
Our fair value
$68.75
53% discount
Analyst target (avg)
$55.00
+22% to current
Target low $37.00Analyst target rangeTarget high $85.00
▲ current $44.93 · | average target
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Current
$44.93
you are here
Conservative
$68.75
+53%
Analyst avg
$55.00
+22%
Our fair value
$68.75
+53%
Analyst high
$85.00
+89%
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Revenue growth
30.10%
Profit margin
23.35%
Debt to equity
132.33
Analyst consensus
Buy · 22 covering
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
SCREEN
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
The common standard· AAOIFI Used by most halal investing apps✗ DOES NOT PASS
Our stricter standard· asset-based The one Titan applies✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity screen. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
Business activityBusiness activity: Financials sectorFail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
PLAIN
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Banking tech fails ethics before value
Every time a bank clears a payment or processes a loan the software underneath often traces back to FIS. The numbers look tempting with 30 percent revenue growth, a 23 percent profit margin and a forward multiple of just 6.1 times earnings. Yet the business activity screen blocks any further look, so we pass.
The moderate moat and 17 percent return on equity cannot offset the ethical failure. Analysts may cluster around a 55 dollar target while our own fair value sits higher, but those figures never reach the table once the screen is triggered.
Currency moves and contract concentration add normal sector risk, yet the ethical call remains the binding constraint. Analysis, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
TRADE
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
FIS trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
TRADER
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 2.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $59. Entered 2026-07-28 · Distribution
JOURNAL
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
2026-07-28Distribution$41.91+2.3%Entry 4
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 2.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $59.
2026-07-18Distribution$40.95+0.0%Entry 3
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $59.
2026-07-03Distribution$40.95+0.0%Entry 2
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
2026-07-02Distribution$40.95Entry 1
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.