The framework has shifted from accumulation to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 5.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 91%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 30%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
Invesco
IVZ · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $13.4B · 7,421 employees
Invesco Ltd.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-29 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 6 days ago
Screened 2026-09-29 · the tape above runs as of 03:09 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 30.42 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 39.00, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Invesco holds its Markdown at $30.42. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 194 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 194 days |
| Price at the screen | $30.42 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 9.33 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.61 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Financials sector | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Invesco does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in conventional financial services, which the screen treats as interest-based, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-10-04. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
The Conscience OverlayThe quantitative screen above is arithmetic. Separately, community boycott lists cite this company: Documented on Palestinian BDS National Committee — category: Institutional Pressure / Financial. The desk records that flag here without folding it into the verdict: the screen measures the balance sheet, the overlay informs the conscience, and they are different judgements that belong to different owners. The second one is yours.
The Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 28% discount to our $39.00 fair value, weak competitive moat, 20.50% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-29 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 28.2% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 13 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +12% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-29 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsAsset managers hit their own ethical wall
Picture a fund house that takes client money yet trips its own business activity screen. Invesco lands in that spot, so we pass despite a forward P/E of 9.3x and revenue growth of 14 percent. The ethical failure overrides any surface appeal.
Numbers tell the same story. Profit margin sits at minus 4 percent, return on equity at minus 2 percent, and the moat is weak. Analysts may cluster around a 31 dollar target, yet the firm shows no durable edge that justifies stepping past the screen.
Asset management earnings swing with markets and flows. A low multiple on weak returns often signals a cyclical trap rather than value. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.3xcheap for a company growing this fast |
| EPS, trailing | -0.68 |
| EPS, forward | 3.26 |
| Revenue growth | +20.5%strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | -0.9%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -0.6%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | 8.49% |
| Dividend yield | 312.00% |
| Debt to equity | 0.12minimal debt: a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 0.71below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 1.61much more volatile than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.04% |
| 52-week range | 20.67 - 33.66 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $13.4B |
| Employees | 7,421 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeIVZ trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from markup to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 8.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 91%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 30%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
The framework has shifted from accumulation to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 7.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 91%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 30%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 91%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 30%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Invesco (IVZ) Stock Fair Value Edges Higher After Analysts Revisit Targets Following Q2 Simply Wall St. · 15d ago
- 1 Mid-Cap Stock on Our Buy List and 2 We Avoid StockStory · 17d ago
- If a Recession Is Coming, History Says This 1 No-Brainer ETF Is the Smartest Buy Right Now Motley Fool · 17d ago
- Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth vs. Invesco SmallCap 600 Revenue: Which Is Better for a Diversified Portfolio? Motley Fool · 17d ago
- Invesco studied 50 years of dividend stock returns to see if owning them really pays off or not TheStreet · 19d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | SHEINWALD NIGEL | Director | 8,112 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | BESHAR SARAH E | Director | 8,112 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | TOLLIVER PAULA | Director | 8,112 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | JOHNSON ELIZABETH S | Director | 8,112 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | FINKE THOMAS MICHAEL | Director | 8,112 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | WOOD PHOEBE A | Director | 8,112 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | WOMACK CHRISTOPHER C. | Director | 8,112 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | GLAVIN WILLIAM FRANCIS JR | Director | 8,112 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | WAGONER G. RICHARD JR. | Director | 8,112 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | GIBBONS THOMAS P | Director | 8,112 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $27.77 | -1.5% | $0.22 | $993 | -0.7% |
| 2 months | $23.40 | +16.9% | $0.22 | $1,178 | +17.8% |
| 3 months | $22.72 | +20.4% | $0.22 | $1,213 | +21.3% |
| 6 months | $26.58 | +2.9% | $0.43 | $1,045 | +4.5% |
| 1 year | $14.31 | +91.2% | $0.85 | $1,971 | +97.1% |
| 2 years | $13.98 | +95.7% | $1.67 | $2,076 | +107.6% |
| 3 years | $14.08 | +94.3% | $2.48 | $2,119 | +111.9% |
| 5 years | $23.72 | +15.3% | $3.94 | $1,319 | +31.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever IVZ does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.