The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (7 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $70. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter.
H.B. Fuller Company
FUL · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $2.7B · 7,100 employees
H.B.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 23 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quoteLast reviewed 6 days ago
Screened 2026-10-23 · the tape above runs as of 04:01 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price49.61 USD at the 23 Oct 2026 close
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans to puts (put/call 1.63)
- Last reviewed23 Oct 2026 (6 days ago)
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
What this means: price 49.61 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 54.89, over the last year.
- Trend Accumulation
- Insiders insiders bought, latest filing 2026-10-07
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 1.63, read 2026-10-27
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its accumulation label.
H.B. Fuller Company holds its Accumulation at $49.61. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 35 days.
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 35 days |
| Price at the screen | $49.61 |
| Valuation | 14.09 trailing · 9.76 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.99 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 40.06% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 40.1% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.07% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.1% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 12.96% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 13.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.14% | Below 5% | Only 0.1% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
H.B. Fuller's business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 40% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-10-28. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when FUL's ethical verdict changes
Today FUL does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-10-23 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 10.6% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 7 covering, consensus Strong Buy. The average target sits +33% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-10-23 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsGlue maker looks cheap but cycles often trap
Walk into any factory making packaging or cars and the adhesives from H.B. Fuller are probably holding things together. Yet the business sits squarely in a cyclical corner of chemicals where demand rises and falls with construction and manufacturing cycles. A forward multiple of 10.7 times flatters the numbers only if current earnings mark the peak rather than the norm.
Revenue is growing at 6 percent with thin 5 percent margins and 9 percent return on equity. Those figures already show limited pricing power. The ethical screen clears the company, yet the low multiple here signals caution rather than value because earnings in this sector tend to collapse faster than investors expect when volumes turn.
The real exposure sits with economic slowdowns that hit volumes first and leave fixed costs stranded. Unknown competitive protection adds another layer of uncertainty. Even strong analyst targets cannot change the structural pattern of peak-cycle multiples looking attractive right before they are not. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.8xpriced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 14.1xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 3.59 |
| EPS, forward | 5.18 |
| Revenue growth | +5.2%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 5.6%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 9.6%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 5.55% |
| Dividend yield | 154.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.01a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.82healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 0.99steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.07% |
| 52-week range | 46.70 - 68.63 |
| Market cap | $2.7B |
| Employees | 7,100 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeFUL trades on the NYSE. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 2.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (7 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $70. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 2.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (7 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $70. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (7 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $70. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (7 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $70. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (7 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $70. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (7 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $70. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 12.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (7 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $70. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 1.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (7 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $70.
The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 10.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 8%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (7 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $70.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- H.B. Fuller (FUL) Could Be 27% Undervalued After Its $850m Debt Raise Yahoo Finance · 5d ago
- H.B. Fuller (FUL) Stock Could Be A Bargain Based On Cash Flow Yahoo Finance · 5d ago
- Why Is H. B. Fuller (FUL) Up 1.8% Since Last Earnings Report? Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
- What Will Decide UnitedHealth Group Stock Over The Next Six Months? Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
- H.B. Fuller Board Unanimously Rejects Second Unsolicited, Non-Binding Proposal for Building Adhesive Solutions Segment Yahoo Finance · 10d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | Bailly R Jeffrey | Dir | P - Purchase | 10,000 | $500,000 |
| 2026-09-28 | Handley Thomas W | Dir | P - Purchase | 2,000 | $98,820 |
| 2026-09-28 | Florness Daniel L | Dir | P - Purchase | 2,030 | $100,160 |
| 2026-09-28 | Rasmussen Trangsrud Teresa J | Dir | P - Purchase | 2,042 | $99,984 |
| 2026-09-29 | Lauber Charles T | Dir | P - Purchase | 2,005 | $99,985 |
| 2026-09-28 | Zaheer Srilata | Dir | P - Purchase | 2,040 | $100,119 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-21 | Susie Lee | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $60.35 | +3.3% | · | $1,033 | +3.3% |
| 2 months | $63.47 | -1.8% | $0.25 | $986 | -1.4% |
| 3 months | $55.07 | +13.2% | $0.25 | $1,136 | +13.6% |
| 6 months | $60.49 | +3.1% | $0.48 | $1,039 | +3.9% |
| 1 year | $57.71 | +8.0% | $0.95 | $1,097 | +9.7% |
| 2 years | $73.83 | -15.6% | $1.85 | $870 | -13.0% |
| 3 years | $62.95 | -1.0% | $2.69 | $1,033 | +3.3% |
| 5 years | $64.88 | -3.9% | $4.16 | $1,025 | +2.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever FUL does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.